Congressional candidates make cash report
by TP staff
Jul 16, 2010 | 3311 views | 47 47 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
David Harmer, the Republican challenging Rep. Jerry McNerney for the 11th Congressional District seat this fall, raised nearly $20,000 more than the incumbent Democrat between May 20 and June 30.

However, McNerney still has far more cash in the bank heading into the fall campaign, reporting $1.25 million on hand as of Thursday, July 15, while Harmer reported $233,000 to the Federal Election Commission on the same date.

An analysis by OpenSecrets.org, a campaign fundraiser watchdog, show that Harmer has also spent far more than McNerney so far this election cycle, which includes both his failed run at California’s 10th Congressional District in 2009 and his successful GOP primary campaign earlier in 2010.

According to OpenSecrets, McNerney has spent $537,000 so far in the 2009-10 election cycle, while Harmer has spend more than $1.4 million.

For more election updates, see the July 23 print edition of the Tracy Press.

Comments
(47)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
HawkEyes2see
|
July 22, 2010
Tom Benigno,

I don't think he would be included since he's not running for office. But i could be wrong. Is there somethong you know? Are you saying someone is paying someone? Who were you talking about?

ChetW?

dcose
|
July 22, 2010
TomBenigno wrote on Thursday, Jul 22 at 11:20 AM »

"Pombo and others had their staff writing for them as well.

That's what they get paid to do, as do the bloggers who support other candidates on this site."

Which bloggers get paid and how much? How does one get on the payroll with them?

Will hold my breath along with waiting for "update on the liberal and contaminated examples I requested"

TomBenigno
|
July 22, 2010
Hawkeye:

If you live here in Tracy he is your congressman also. Pombo and others had their staff writing for them as well.

That's what they get paid to do, as do the bloggers who support other candidates on this site.
HawkEyes2see
|
July 21, 2010
Look Tom, this article says even less than you have about their "shortcomings". You ought to remember what newspaper you are reading. And maybe turning it the right way to read it might help a little. And I suppose you've left us to guess what you mean by "their shortcomings" again? I could only suppose you were referring to their campaign chests?

Tell you what, Tom if you raised that kind of money do you think you could win? And if not how does the amount in the chest matter?

Well, before you disagree let me propose a solution to your complaint.

Which I'm sure your favorite congressman (having written three or four bills to 'honor' three or four other Democrats in the congresaional district (?) might find easy enough to please the populace?

Why not propose each candidate begin writing letters to the papers explaining their positions and bills they might pass. They might want to explain the three or four bills that were successfully passed to 'honor' other democrats in their congressional district?

Then have the federal government print more money which I actually understand they are already working on. I understand there may already be a plan to give newspapers bailout moneys. So, they could give the printed money to any paper who will print both candidate's writings.

Your congressman may even have home field advantage because he already has his staff do his writings for him?

What do you say, Tom?
dcose
|
July 21, 2010
Juan Benigno

If "None of it matters" why bother commenting?

Any update on the liberal and contaminated examples I requested?
TomBenigno
|
July 21, 2010
Hawkeyestosee:

Who is Ernie? The article is about the two candidates and their short comings. If you stand behind them, then Harmer becomes the left guy.

None of it matters.
HawkEyes2see
|
July 21, 2010
mnwild,

I think people get a good look at their elected officials. I'm guessing they tried to size up the last candidate at the Monte Vista debate. This year they will get a second chance. Hopefully they will elect someone better into office.
mnwild
|
July 21, 2010
Problem is, they all seem to "jump ship" in the end in order to get reelected -- even on the local level. If a person has the best intentions and is elected to an office, they end up making choices that someone's not going to like. Question is, do they vote for what's in the best interest of those they represent, or do they vote for what will garner them more votes during the next election. And then there are the $$$$$. Can't get reelected without cash and can't get cash unless someone likes what you stand for OR they feel their financial support will benefit them. It's NOT my measly $25 donation to a candidate that will pay for newspaper ads, signs, buttons, etc. etc., it's the $1000 or $5000 donations from PAC's and businesses and others with "deep pockets" that pay for political campaigns. Guess you could call it the "American Way", tho I doubt George Washington and Thomas Jefferson envisioned it this way when they founded our Nation.
HawkEyes2see
|
July 21, 2010
Tom Benigno,

Let's not mix the issues. Look at the picture in the paper Jerry is clearly on the left.

And what does ernie have to do with this article, or any other article, for that matter? What did ernie ever do?

Let's get back to the present issue.

Didn't you once say that McNerney shoul spend money for his own district. If he wants to help two vets in French Camp and the rest in the Foothills, then why doesn't he run for office in a different congressional district, like the Lt. Governor did?

If you were a congressman don't you think it would be an honor to serve the people who elected you?

I just don't see that happening with our Congressman, Tom.
dcose
|
July 21, 2010
TomBenigno wrote on Wednesday, Jul 21 at 07:03 AM »

"As with Mc Nerney and Pombo they jumped ship on issues to get money from lobbyist or special interest to get elected. Harmer is no different."

Could you provide specific examples? and of contamination?
TomBenigno
|
July 21, 2010
Greenhornet:

I'm not saying everyone are the same. I'm saying both parties are contaminated with party members who infiltrated each party.

As with Mc Nerney and Pombo they jumped ship on issues to get money from lobbyist or special interest to get elected. Harmer is no different.

That's politics, right DC.

thegreenlantern
|
July 21, 2010
Tom,

Are you at a stage in live where everybody in the entire world is a lumped into one category? You know the people who say, "they're all the same"?

If so, I just wanted to clarify if that makes you one of them? Or what makes you different?

dcose
|
July 21, 2010
Good morning Mrs. B,

TomBenigno wrote on Tuesday, Jul 20 at 04:50 PM

"I'm sorry but I didn't have much of a choice between Mc Nerney or Pombo, they were both liberals..." Clearly they were.

The American Conservative Union

McNerney- 9.67 Lifetime Rating

Pombo- 95.79 Lifetime Rating

http://www.conservative.org/congress-ratings/

"...About supporting the party I have a great record of donating to the republican party."

While giving of yourself to McNerney's.

SanJoaquinCitizen
|
July 20, 2010
Well, that settles it. If Tom is supporting McNerney I'm voting for the other guy.
TomBenigno
|
July 20, 2010
Mr C:

I'm sorry but I didn't have much of a choice between Mc Nerney or Pombo, they were both liberals. We needed a change. By the way who did you vote for so that you could get some construction jobs?

You never will end your little game will you. Harmer nor Mc Nerney will never help us out of this mess that we are in. Just keep going to council meetings, but don't forget to wipe your nose after you leave.

As for my past I'm proud of what I achieved, can you say that? I don't think so. About supporting the party I have a great record of donating to the republican party.

dcose
|
July 20, 2010
apathy wrote on Tuesday, Jul 20 at 10:41 AM »

"...Case in point your record of financial support of the RNC and Republican candidates like Pombo and Wilson, (http://www.city-data.com/elec2/elec-TRACY-CA.html"

Though I supported both, all that sleuthing...dcose- Dale Cose.

Not that your political affiliations could ever impact your opinion on a Democratic politician like McNerney!

The more he votes to increase deficits and spending... the less I like him. Straight forward.

Hi Tom, you looking forward to supporting McNerney again? or running from your past?
TomBenigno
|
July 20, 2010
Oh I must go.
apathy
|
July 20, 2010
dcose stated, "History hasn't been rewritten, it's standard writing by a journalist with an agenda... I am shocked".

Seems lots of folks have an "agenda"! Case in point your record of financial support of the RNC and Republican candidates like Pombo and Wilson, (http://www.city-data.com/elec2/elec-TRACY-CA.html) Not that your political affiliations could ever impact your opinion on a Democratic politician like McNerney!
ConcernedNeighbor
|
July 20, 2010
So many Tracyites wouldn't have to drive so far to work if they had employment in Tracy.

Someone/or group seems to enjoy seeing Tracy lose out on opportunities. Just my impression.

CN
ConcernedNeighbor
|
July 20, 2010
apathy...

"...bet there was a time when Tracy wasn't considered much of anything..."

You can thank the obstructs for keeping it that way!!!

Tracy would be perfect for a campus, veterans center and many others, but someone sure didn't want to see Tracy grow.

CN


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.