Your Voice: Blindsided again by federal taxes
by Donna J. Wallis, Tracy
Apr 09, 2010 | 1232 views | 13 13 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
EDITOR,

Many people don’t know how the health care bill is really going to be financed. It will be through the Alternative Minimum Tax.

As a tax professional, I have been preparing 2010 federal tax projections for many of my clients. Their 2010 tax bills will be as much as $8,000 to $12,000 higher using the same income and deductions they had in 2009. This horrendous tax does not affect just high-income taxpayers. This tax can affect a single taxpayer earning $80,000, increasing their tax by $4,000, or a married couple earning just $85,000, increasing their tax by $5,500.

My congressman, Jerry McNerney, seems unconcerned about the plight of the taxpayer.

My husband contacted his Stockton office on March 3, and I e-mailed his D.C. office at the same time inquiring if there was any pending legislation to “fix” this tax by raising the AMT exemption. To date, we have had no response, and the April 15 estimated tax due date is quickly approaching.

In addition, I tried to contact the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and again received no response. Are the American taxpayers once again going to be blindsided?

Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
dcose
|
April 12, 2010
Chet,

a course in basic accounting and economics might help change your grasp of financial reality.
dcose
|
April 12, 2010
doors17 wrote on 4/10/10

"It only seems to be a issue to the party out of power when they can use it to invoke the futures of their kids and grandchildren, and then despite the promises that if elected things will change, they never do."

Like slavery, civil rights, lowered taxes etc. Continued Cluelessness.

HawkEyes2see
|
April 11, 2010
Tom Benigno,

MarkJ is right. The healthcare bill is bad 4 business. ChetW can pat himself and Jerry on the back, but the healyhcare bill does nothing to fix the problem except force me and other taxpayers to pay for others.

That's like paying for a cancer patient's cigars with OUR tax money.

TomBenigno
|
April 11, 2010
Jon:

Where are some of these bloggers coming from? Maybe we should tax the bloggers to generate taxes for the flag waving members of the T party. Remember No New Taxes.
JimF01
|
April 11, 2010
Thanks for that list Chet. That list, along with the SCHIP cigarette tax incresase, Obama's 2011 budget proposals, listed here

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704107204575038733246595218.html

with the budget deficits the words

HAD ENOUGH?

at the bottom will make a great sign for the TEA Party event this year out at the Pleasanton Fairgrounds, this Thursday from 2pm - 7pm.

Free admission and free parking, if you are in the area, come on by.

http://www.pleasantonteaparty.com/

markj
|
April 11, 2010
First of all, anyone who believes the healthcare bill isn't going to cost at least three times what we are being told, is not only naive but also does not know the first thing about how things work.

Americans will continue to get fatter and more sedentary in their life styles - this is a trend which the bill does nothing to address. A tanning tax? No offense intended, but a fat tax would be more apropos.

Market costs dictate insurance rates - it doesn't work the other way around. The lower the risk/exposure,the lower the premiums. If you own a home in a designated brush zone, you will pay 2 -4 times the premium of a house in a low risk zone. Simple, and the way it should be.

When all the claims start rolling in from all the people with pre-existing conditions, most of which were caused by the self induced neglect of their bodies, and the claims keep coming and coming and coming over their entire life with no caps - the system will collapse. Pooling and the sharing of risk is a basic principle of insurance but it is a fact that risk pools can become saturated with bad risks. At that point insurance companies can either raise rates, or pull out of that particular market segment. Again, simple and the way it should be.

This bill is a massive welfare program and it will eventually collapse, or the cost will sky rocket. There is nothing being done to reduce the causes of high healthcare cost and if premiums are forced down with not only no reduction in risk, but actually a massive increase, the situation will become untenable.

What this bill does accomplish, is taking away the motivation of people to get off their asses and take responsibility for themselves. Hey look at me, I can be an out of shape, smoking, drinking, sit on my butt, do nothing food stamp collector, and everyone else is paying for it. Thanks mom and dad, I'm on your dime until I'm 26 - yipeeee. Pathetic.
doors17
|
April 10, 2010
I don't think either party has any bragging rights when it comes to balanced budgets or non-deficits local, state or federal.

It only seems to be a issue to the party out of power when they can use it to invoke the futures of their kids and grandchildren, and then despite the promises that if elected things will change, they never do.
dcose
|
April 10, 2010
Chet condemns his children's children to our debt by minority choice.

Your legacy thanks their socialist grandfather for the low standard of living.
HawkEyes2see
|
April 10, 2010
ChetW,

I respect your opinion, but what lies?

There are an awful lot of out of work 26 year olds. Why should we have to pay their medical? When I was 26 I didn't want to purchase insurance. I pocketed the money instead. Many are uninsured by choice. Essentially your congress are cramming it down their throats to pay. Whether or not they wanted. Now they have no choice. If they refuse. They get financially penalized.

I thought I recall our congressman sitting in Tracy saying he wouldn't discriminate.



So what has our congressman done for Tracy?

ChetW
|
April 10, 2010
"Now is the time to deliver reform for thousands of families who face financial crisis to afford medical care and for the small business owners who are struggling to keep their doors open,"

YES we Can.

YES we DID!!!!!!

Thank you Jerry McNerney
ChetW
|
April 10, 2010
People in Tracy along with everyone in District 11 and in the whole country are seeing the results of the hard work by Jerry McNerney in passing health Care Reform. Families no longer need to worry about kids being refused coverage by Health Insurance Companies and can keep children on the family policy up to 26 years old. This plus the strong support by Jerry of our soldiers, veterans and families has been fantastic. The Health Care Bill has been passed and it does not include increasing AMT to pay for our Health Care Bill. But I guess you will keep trying to spread lies about our Health Care Bill. I am sure one of the main reasons the GOP and Cons were afraid of Health Care passing is that people would soon see that the B/S being spread about the bill by GOPers and CONS would all turn out to be fear mongering lies. And today that is already becoming the case.
HawkEyes2see
|
April 09, 2010
ChetW,

In fact, the only way they can finance bad healthcare is through the AMT. I tried to tell our congressman that it would cost us more and that the jobs he told us it would create would be medical transcriptionist jobs that our congress would send (and is already) sending overseas. But would he listen?

Listen, there is no other way hto finance the bad healthcare that our congress voted on. And I just found out it won't even pay for the FD when they respond to an emergency 911 call.

Imagine. Our congressman missed an opportunity to improve the healthcare but didn't listen, why?

And can someone tell us ONE thing that our congressman has EVER done for Tracy?

Anyone?

Who does he think he is, RobinHood?
ChetW
|
April 09, 2010
It is not correct that any 2010 Alternative Minimum Tax increase is to finance any part of our new Health Care Bill. I follow with the correct changes to tax law that are connected to the Health Care Bill programs. Please do not continue to attempt to spread lies about our Health Care Bill being financed by AMT increases.

Implementation Schedule of Health Care Tax Increases, 2010-2018

Journal of Accountancy, Health Care Reform Reshapes Tax Code:

Implementation Schedule



2010

Adoption credit increase

Adoption-assistance program increase

Tanning excise tax



2011

Small business tax credit

Prescription drug coverage deduction eliminated

W-2 reporting

SIMPLE cafeteria plans

Restrictions on use of HSA and FSA funds for over-the-counter drugs

Tax on HSA distributions increase



2012 1099s required for payments to corporations

Adoption credit sunset

Adoption-assistance programs sunset



2013 Increase in medical deduction threshold for taxpayers under age 65

Additional hospital insurance tax on high-income taxpayers

Medicare tax on investment income

Fees on health plans (after Oct. 1, 2012)

Medical device excise tax

Flexible spending arrangement maximum imposed



2014 Premium assistance credit

Excise tax on uninsured individuals

Excise tax on applicable large employers

Insurer reporting requirements

Eligible premiums included in cafeteria plans



2017 Increase in medical deduction threshold for taxpayers age 65 and over



2018 Excise tax on high-cost employer plans



We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.