Annual spring clean-up canceled
by Justin Lafferty / TP staff
Apr 03, 2010 | 4599 views | 21 21 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Everything from furniture to clothes to garden clippings was put on Holly Drive for the 2008 spring trash pickup.  Press file photo
Everything from furniture to clothes to garden clippings was put on Holly Drive for the 2008 spring trash pickup. Press file photo
slideshow
Tracy will cancel its annual citywide spring cleanup this year, citing a deficit in the public works department.

Money to pay for the extra rubbish pickup comes from trash collection fees, but Kevin Tobeck, director of public works, said the city gets less money from fees each year because of foreclosures and the lack of construction. Fewer people in homes means fewer collection bills, Tobeck said.

Tracy budget officer Allan Borwick said the city received about $706,000 less from solid waste pickups in the most recent fiscal year than the previous year. Most of that, he said, could be chalked up to foreclosures.

“It’s currently a reflection of the economy and the restraints we have on our solid waste fund,” Tobeck said. “By next year, we’d be running a deficit, and we certainly want to try and avoid that.”

Tobeck said public works decided about three months ago to cut the cleanup, during which Tracy residents could leave larger items, such as TVs and refrigerators or yard trimmings, on the curb. He said city employees will make a decision later about the fall cleanup, based on how the budget looks at that time.

Tobeck described the move as a way to save some money without disrupting weekly collection.

The department is still spending a bit more than it’s taking in, Borwick said. Even after taking out the spring cleanup, the solid waste budget falls short by about $800,000, he said. Tobeck said that last year, the city spent $72,920 on spring cleanup.

“We’ll keep our fingers crossed, but for right now, we’re holding off,” he said.

Tobeck also noted that people would sometimes abuse the system by leaving more than the posted limit — the equivalent of 10 32-gallon trash bags — on their curb. Borwick said the city reimburses Tracy Delta Disposal based on the tonnage their trucks collect.

Tobeck added that city workers have seen scavengers walking around and taking things people have left on the curb. He has also seen people from out of town dumping their trash on city streets on cleanup days.

“Some people will be frustrated that they can’t put some of their solid waste out,” Tobeck said. “They’ll have to do something else, or they’ll have to hold onto it and see if we can do something in the fall.”

Public works management analyst Jennifer Cariglio said her employees have already heard some complaints from people who have called to ask about the cleanup.

“They are disappointed, because instead of it being a cost to the city, now they have to pay for it,” Cariglio said.

Tobeck maintained that discards can still be taken to the local Material Recovery Facility, 30703 MacArthur Drive, for a fee. He added that other disposal days, such as those for electronic waste and packing foam, should probably still be in place.

Comments
(21)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
TracyCitizen
|
April 06, 2010
I am very dissappointed the spring clean up has been cancelled. I am employed full time, do not own a truck and I have always been grateful (and obeyed by it's rules) for this service.

I have no problem with people gathering up my throw aways to recycle/reuse as long as they don't leave a mess.

I wonder if there is a way where those who want this service would be willing to pay an extra $5.00? I know I would be happy to do so. A whole lot cheaper and easier than renting/borrowing a truck, gas and a trip to the dump.

As mentioned already, no doubt our monthly garbage fees will not be lowered even though our service has been reduced.
tracy-ed
|
April 06, 2010
defras13 wrote:

"Who's running this city anyway?"

Different article, different subject, same nagging question!

If we keep asking, m a y b e , we'll finally get an answer. (Not holding my breath)
scottpro
|
April 05, 2010
I've used this service maybe once or twice in my 13 years here. However, more and more restrictions on what could be picked up (no yard waste, no construction debris, "special calls" for e-waste, etc), have left me no alternative but to load up the truck and head to the dump. I also despised having my street turn into something akin to a Miami slum twice a year.

That being said, since there will be a slight reduction in the operating costs of Delta Disposal Service (the foreclosure thing is BS, sorry), will we the God-fearing bill payers of tracy see a reduction in our collection rates? I'm betting not.
VTgirl
|
April 05, 2010
What Kevin Tobeck, said doesn't make sense and if it deosn't make sense its not true! If they received less money due to foreclosures this year that also means that they will do less pickups due to foreclosures because people arent' leaving in those homes "Hello" doesn't 1 1= 2 he is making it seem line 1 1= 3 and we all know its not true. For all of us that due pay our monthly fees we should be given that service.
dfras13
|
April 04, 2010
It's another way for "We the people" to suffer because of their bad management. If you want this service we should call our mayor and councilmen and demand that Leon and his minions restore it. Who's running this city anyway?
dfras13
|
April 04, 2010
I'm sure there are ways to transfer money from the solid waste fund to the general fund if the city wanted to be creative. this is another way for Leon and his minions to make us think the city is going broke. With over 200 million in assets surely the city can find a way to support this type of service, since the quality of life in Tracy is soooo important to them.
doors17
|
April 04, 2010
Sneaky, my point was as I said that the scavengers have to be the most disappointed about this especially now during this economic downturn when we would most likely see many more.

As I also said, I don't care. If someone finds a use for my trash either for personal use or to sell then be my guest. I just don't like it when they leave a mess for me to clean up, and when many items end up in the streets where it can be a traffic hazard for me and others, and could cause tire damage. After they get done with a neighborhood, sometimes but not always it can be like driving a obstacle course.

Have a great Easter Sneaky, and to the many of you. :o)
mnwild
|
April 03, 2010
Sneaky, believe it or not, scavenging from garbage cans/toters/boxes IS against almost every City's ordinance and scavengers CAN be cited. The bottom line is garbage/recycling placed curbside is City property, so a scavenger is stealing from the City. Enforcement is a whole other issue. Some cities leave scavengers alone unless they are causing a problem (ie. dumping toters to get to the "good recyclables" or becoming aggressive with customers) or the scavenger happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and is seen by law enforcement. Others like the one I worked were very aggressive with enforcement because of the financial losses to the City. My experience here in Tracy is more of the former mainly because of limited resources for enforcement.
Sneaky
|
April 03, 2010
I always kind of wondered why the city was doing this anyway. It is nice when you have something to get rid of but why should all of us pay for a service that only some use? I would far rather see them lower garbage bills and let people take their larger items to the dump themselves.

Its funny how the administrative types always whine about how they are losing money because they now get money from fewer homes due to all the foreclosures. Umm, don't you also have fewer homes to collect trash from? It seems to me that should make up for the loss, assuming you do some appropriate head count reductions.

The comment about scavengers taking the trash is kind of funny. He didnt go anywhere with it. What is the point? Is this some kind of problem? I cant imagine its illegal to take garbage left on the street. Not to mention that if someone else can get more use out of some of the items, then great. It saves some space in the dump and reduces waste.
mnwild
|
April 03, 2010
It's against the law for Enterprise Funds (funds generated by direct billing customers for a specific service such as water, sewer and garbage) to be used for General Fund expenses like those mentioned by sofie48 and A_DOGS_LIFE. The reality of the situation is that fewer customers (business and private) means less money into the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund.

Most garbage collection contracts are multi-year, so prices were negotiated when the economy was up. Now that it isn't, Tracy and many other cities have to increase rates OR cut service OR both. Cutting the curbside clean-up program is just that-- a service cut. In the past the return on recyclables has offset expenses, but for now the bottom has fallen out of that market. Cardboard was once shipped overseas to China for packaging the products they manufacture. The US and other countries aren't buying due to poor economic conditions, so there's no need for China to buy our cardboard to use as packaging. It's a vicious cycle that results in pallets of used cardboard sitting on docks hoping for someone to buy them. Even aluminum and plastics are not paying as much as in the past. And, there are more individuals recycling than before to help defray personal expenses, so the City isn't getting that return.

Anger and frustration are expected given how badly Leon and his "minions" and the Council have responded to Tracy's budget problems so far, but garbage fees and the Solid Waste budget/expenses ARE being negatively impacted by our current economy (including foreclosures) more than mismanagement or poor decisions.
sofie48
|
April 03, 2010
Ya operating cost over inflated salaries, paid sickleave paid medical high reirement pay ect.ect over indulgents,
A_DOGS_LIFE
|
April 03, 2010
Money to pay for the extra rubbish pickup comes from trash collection fees, but Kevin Tobeck, director of public works, said the city gets less money from fees each year because of foreclosures and the lack of construction. Fewer people in homes means fewer collection bills, Tobeck said.

Kevin how dare you blame this on Foreclosures!!!

Unless you’re Stupid.

“The city of Tracy still charges for water and Waste disposal service to families that have been foreclosed upon up and until the Foreclosed home Title changes hands back to the Mortgage Holder or the Home is sold to another party then the responsibility falls on the new property owner. “

Kevin what are you Hiding

Kevin come out and say where the funds have actually gone to. or is it that you are A Chicken SH*% to say the money has gone to additional Bonuses for the City of Tracy’s Managers Or another” BIG DOG”.

doors17
|
April 03, 2010
I'll bet the people who are most disappointed by this news are the scavengers who go through your trash to either sell or use themselves, which is fine, I don't care but many of them leave a mess after you took the time to leave a neat pile for easy pickup.
adios
|
April 03, 2010
FYI - The flexible large trash pick-up saved the city of Livermore $$$$$. Very happy customer's over the hill!
victor_jm
|
April 03, 2010
Why don’t people examine their lives and stop collecting junk. I have never used this service and I don’t want to be charged for something I don’t need.
mnwild
|
April 03, 2010
Alot of us (me included) have been beating up the City for its spending, and now that a program that cost $72,920 in 2009 has been cut, we're still complaining. The way to keep programs like curbside clean-up in place is to increase garbage rates, and it wasn't too long ago that was discussed and a whole bunch of folks came upset by that idea. Many cities that HAD curbside clean-up "trashed" (sorry for the pun) the idea long ago. (The Bay Area city I worked stopped curbside clean-up in early 2000.) Tracy held on as long as it could, but with less revenue something had to give.

As for sofie48's comment about collecting just the houses where people live. It doesn't make a difference in operating costs unless an entire subdivision were vacant. Tracy Disposal personnel and equipment drive down a street and only collect those toters placed curbside. My next door neighbor doesn't always put out all their toters, but that truck and those workers still drive past to the next house, so the operating costs don't change because one or two or even 10 houses in a subdivision are vacant. There might be a little less garbage for processing at the end of the line, but again, the equipment must process the garbage from houses with residents, thus keeping the operating costs the same.

Tracyschooldist, the amount paid at the Material Recovery Facility (dump) is minimal and will be offset by the "midnight dumping" done by folks who refuse to pay the disposal fee. Even with the City's curbside clean-up in place, there were "stray" items that shouldn't have been put out during the curbside clean-up hanging around for weeks. Then finally City personnel were called to pick them up, thus costing more $$$$. If everyone with items to discard did the right thing and brought them to the MRF, it might make a difference, but that's not going to happen, I guarantee it! (No, not a pessimist, just worked in city solid waste and recycling for 3 years and in maintenance operations for 15!)

adios
|
April 03, 2010
In Livermore - You can call for heavy trash pick-up three times a year. The city of Livermore has an excellent service! They effectively eliminated the trash free for all and scavenger hunt twice a year. Customer's have flexible waste disposal, un-like Tracy.
tracyschooldist
|
April 03, 2010
Now thay will get money for the stuff you set out on your street for free. Let's see, lets do the math . one trip to the dump =$10 or more X all the houses in tracy = $$$$$$$$$$ (YA BABY)
sofie48
|
April 03, 2010
With all the empty houses you dont have to pick then the only houses to pick up would be the ones that pay for the service Right.....How hard is that to figure out
Jackson12
|
April 03, 2010
instead of cutting services why don't you do what the private sector has been forced to do and lay off some OVERPAID employees. There's plenty of fat in the city.


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.