Living Green: Where would your dot go?
by Christina Frankel/For the Tracy Press
Feb 24, 2010 | 1393 views | 5 5 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
There are many different shades to the color green. As a child, coloring would have included the Crayola green, a very respectable middle-of-the-road, darker green. When people discuss green as a movement, most picture a lighter green, more like that of Kermit the Frog, or the color of new grass. Well, Tracy is embarking on an Emerald City status, evoking images of a crystal green from the Wizard of Oz.

When it comes to sustainability, it’s not the intensity of the color of green that matters, but the commitment behind the color. Last week, Tracy residents had the opportunity to rate the color of their green with dots, signifying which sustainability measure Tracy should focus on. The event was the one and only public workshop in the process that the city has evolved to: Drafting a sustainability action plan — or SAP — to gain the city an Emerald status.

The city’s commitment toward sustainability has been slow to evolve. Although progress had already started by late 2008, the city got a kick in the pants last year: The Center for Biological Diversity sent Tracy a letter, commenting on our general plan update and its ineffectual ability to deal with sprawl as required by Assembly Bill 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Since the city of Stockton had already been sued for its “business as usual” sprawl general plan, the writing was on the wall that change was necessary.

To craft a direction, originally the city had plans for multi-day community sustainability charette with interactive public input. When the economy tanked, the city scraped the charette in favor of a state-run fledgling program called the Emerald Cities project. Boosted by help from federal stimulus money, the process has the promise to be more than just public talking points.

The core of the Emerald status is the creation of a citywide sustainability action plan. For business owners out there, a SAP is like a mission statement and business plan rolled into one. It’s putting in writing a commitment to sustainability, and as “action” implies, includes the steps on how to get there.

And there is a target. The city proposes that we will reduce our greenhouse gas emissions — or GHG — by 29 percent by 2020.

The first step toward a goal is to establish where you are. For that, Tracy had to calculate its baseline GHG. That part of the study was completed in December 2009.

The news wasn’t all that shocking: Tracyites spend most of their time in a car, with 63 percent of our community GHG coming from transportation.

Like all over-indulgences, it’s hard to stop bad habits cold-turkey. To make change work, sustainable reduction needed to be attacked in various areas.

Last week, the city presented 41 emission-reduction strategies and another 44 non-quantified measures defining ways we can reduce our GHG.

For those in the room, 10 sticky dots were handed out. The premise was simple: Stick the dots on those strategies that were a priority. Although I jokingly asked for more, 10 is all we got.

Not counting officials and staff, there weren’t even enough people in attendance to give half of the measures one dot, let alone a priority. For myself, with the opinion the city is languishing behind in sustainability, 10 priorities seemed a discouraging small step. But a step it is, in the right direction, though if it is with enough commitment has yet to be seen.

For a change: Recycle. Recycle. Recycle. If we recycled 75 percent of our waste, we could save a whopping 14 percent of our expenditure of local GHG emissions.

To make a difference: Reduce your car trips. Walk. Bike. Take the bus.

To take a stand: Rate the color of your green: Visit EmeraldTracy.org and download the sustainability measures. Let Kimberly Matlock know where your dots would go. Contact her at 831-6430 or at kimberly.matlock@ci.tracy.ca.us. Let your voice be counted.

• Christina D.B. Frankel is a 20-year Tracy resident, architect and mother of three. Her column, Living Green, runs twice-monthly in the Tracy Press. She can be reached at cdfrankel@sbcglobal.net.

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
aliqsandre8
|
April 28, 2010
Tracy should adopt these measures to attain its Green goals faster:

1)All new residences shall have at least 60% of the roof facing south and covered with solar panels. For apartments, condominiums and commercial buildings, this requirement shall be for the entire roof.

2)All apartments, old and new, shall provide, by each garbage bin, space for 4 recycle bins duly labeled: Paper, Glass, Aluminum, and Other Metals. Residents shall be reminded by written circular about these bins and to wash food containers before recycling.
aliqsandre8
|
April 28, 2010
Tracy should adopt these measures to attain its Green goals faster:

1)All new residences shall have at least 60% of the roof facing south and covered with solar panels. For apartments, condominiums and commercial buildings, this requirement shall be for the entire roof.

2)All apartments, old and new, shall provide, by each garbage bin, space for 4 recycle bins duly labeled: Paper, Glass, Aluminum, and Other Metals. Residents shall be reminded by written circular about these bins and to wash food containers before recycling.
ShiloN
|
February 25, 2010
"Not counting officials and staff, there weren’t even enough people in attendance to give half of the measures one dot, let alone a priority. For myself, with the opinion the city is languishing behind in sustainability, 10 priorities seemed a discouraging small step. But a step it is, in the right direction, though if it is with enough commitment has yet to be seen."

Let's not jump to the conclusion that we are languishing behind. Other cities our size are in a very similar position. We are probably on par instead of languishing behind.

Maybe not having enough dots to fill all the measures was a way of prioritizing the measures. Glad that they didn't give one person all the dots. Somebody might put all those dots all over one measure. That wouldn't be fair to others.
offtoworkigo
|
February 24, 2010
Christina,

It would have been nice to see what the cost was to find our baseline GHG. Can you let us know? And can you let us know what the city is spending in labor hours and other expenses in this ongoing project?

Or is this just another article trying to make us feel bad for driving our cars?

I think the reason attendance was low is that most people see through this whole 'green' 'global warming' issue.

Most people are tired of the gov't politicos telling us we are being bad and how we should behave.

Most people are tired of the gov't politicos wasting money on their pet projects.

Most people are doing the best they can and don't appreciate being hit over the head constantly about how their not doing enough or spending enough.

Can you give me a total monetary cost, to society, of all the 'green' programs, in all the cities, counties and states of this great nation?

Just what is this costing us?

Please, I'd like to know
JimF01
|
February 24, 2010
Take these proposed sustainability measures one by one. Some are, as advertised, quite costly to implement. How much can we afford, in this economy, to spend on this program?

take the Green Building Ordinance, one mandate would be a:

"program to encourage the installation of 200,000 solar water heating systems to offset natural gas

usage for water and space heating. The incentives would be funded by a utility company surcharge on

certain natural gas customers up to $250 million over ten years"

now AB1470 goes ahead and establishes the surcharge on ALL ratepayers, except those with incomes under 300% of the poverty level. So that is approximately $64,000 for a four member household.

This measure alone already hits Tracy residents right in the pocketbook. Jack up our natural gas rates, put the money in a "Gas Consumption Surcharge Fund" and we are going 'to "encourage" the installation of solar water heating systems'.

Do we ratepayers get our money back if the solar water systems are not installed? No.

I am no expert on these sustainability measures, but I think in these economic times, we need to comb through line by line, Tracy residents are entitled to an accounting of the direct costs to us of the sustainability measures being proposed.


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.