Tracy Unified readies its to-cut list
by Cassie Tomlin
Jan 22, 2010 | 1643 views | 5 5 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Tracy Unified School District has to chop $20 million from its budget in the next three years.

During the past two weeks, officials came up with possible ways to save $14 million, and on Tuesday, the district’s board of trustees will see a list of potential budget cuts at its meeting.

By March 30, the district has to nail down what it can give up for the 2010-11 school year that starts this August, as well as for the 2011-12 year after that.

Tuesday’s $14 million list should be a good indicator of the final reductions.

The district will cut $11 million for the next school year and $2.9 million more for the year after.

Suggested changes include shuttering Gifted and Talented Education classes, laying off special-education instructors, eliminating art programs and getting rid of buses for kindergartners who attend class in the afternoon.

After Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s budget proposal earlier this month, the board learned that education bears a quarter of this year’s $19.9 billion state budget shortfall

Casey Goodall, associate superintendent of business, broke the news to the board at its Jan. 12 meeting.

He said after that meeting that he was unsure what more could be taken from the district’s 20 schools. Last year, the district approved a tentative list of $3.6 million in possible cuts for 2010-11 and $2.1 million for 2011-12.

The board will also hear from Hirsch and Central elementary schools’ site councils about the schools’ achievements and activities.

It will congratulate the winners of the district spelling bee, the Tracy High varsity football team that won the San Joaquin Athletic Association title in the fall and the outstanding employees for last year’s winter semester.

Contact Tracy Press reporter Cassie Tomlin at 830-4225 or ctomlin@tracypress.com. At a glance

WHAT: Tracy Unified School District board meeting

WHEN: 7 p.m. Tuesday

WHERE: District office, 1875 W. Lowell Ave.

INFO: 830-3200

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ckeenan
|
January 24, 2010
Actually due to the budget crisis that state law requiring the purchase of new text books was waved for any district that asked. Tracy asked and received a waiver.
usn-cmc
|
January 24, 2010
Speaking as an "average citizen", I DO mind my taxes being increased when excess and waste still exists within any public agency. Whether it's schools or federal, state or local government, if they aren't tightening their belts, then why should I be asked to provide more funds to them?

We all have limited resources and if publicly funded agencies realize their pool of money is no longer endless, then maybe present resources would go further and there wouldn't be a need to ask for more. However, once publicly funded agencies show they have done all they can and they still need funds, then we "average citizens" need to step up and invest in our children and their future.

NativeTracy
|
January 24, 2010
Unfortunately, I believe there is a state law requiring school districts to purchase NEW textbooks on a subject retotating bases every other year, so that's probably where the $10 million must go.

Schools need more funds. Taxes providing funds. Taxes need to go up. Average citizens don't mind paying $65 each month for each of the following: lattes, cable and/or wireless phones; but try to raise their taxes and there will be a hooting and a hollerin'!
ckeenan
|
January 24, 2010
The GATE program gets additional funding other classes do not get. This is why they have more resources in their classrooms and can take field trips other classes can not afford.

BY the way TUSD has a fund called "books and supplies" with 10 million dollars in it. Since my classroom budget last year was $100.00 that is obviously not for the classroom. I think they should cut that one first. They also have a 20% reserve for a rainy day- guess what it is raining!
ronniedes
|
January 22, 2010
Just wondering how closing the GATE classes will save money. It's not as if those students disappear into thin air and don't need to be taught any longer, so where are the savings? And doesn't that money come from special state funds, and not from the district's general funds?


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.