Town Crier: Time to take back government
by Dave Hardesty
Sep 01, 2009 | 1536 views | 52 52 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
As a child, I remember when freeways and expressways didn’t exist and the street I lived on in the center of my town was a dirt road. Today, what used to take half a day to drive can now be done in less than 30 minutes.

With advancements, there are costs. With automobiles, it is accidents, cost of fuel and pollution. With television and computers, we’ve abandoned our social lives and sequester ourselves with these devices that spoon-feed us information instead of providing us information we need to know — all in the name of politics.

In the words of a founding document, The Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

In the first sentence, the principals of equality, rights, happiness and God the creator, are addressed. The notion our nation was formed based on any other “truths” is not arguable.

Note that we only have the right to pursue happiness — we are not guaranteed to have happiness, or free health care for that matter.

That being said, we often overlook the second part of the paragraph, which states our government derives its power from the people it governs. Should it start to govern at its own will instead, the declaration does not just recommend the people abolish it — it indicates an obligation for them to do so.

I see dangerous things in our government today.

One concerns the national health care bill. Instead of publishing it so everyone can educate themselves, we are told it has to be rushed into law, and public “education” is spoon-fed by people who carefully control its dissemination.

We see “town hall” meetings in which elected representatives marginalize the voices of dissenting citizens and promote their own agendas. Thus, citizen voices are being locked out by others calling them names, discrediting their knowledge and restricting their First Amendment rights.

I find it intolerable and disgusting that the Speaker of the House or any official would make implications that dissenting views toward the government are being made by “swastika-wearing Nazis.”

But the most upsetting thing is the incremental erosions we see to the Constitution that protects our rights.

First, the attempts to disarm law-abiding citizens of their guns by scrapping the Second Amendment, followed by an attempt to control ammunition.

Second, attempts to stifle free speech by controlling the media, in particular talk radio, with a so-called Fairness Doctrine.

Next, attempts to ferret out dissenters by collecting personal information on them and using it to stifle their dissent, such as a White House-sponsored e-mail address where one can clandestinely report such dissenters.

Today, we have elected officials who have stated they will vote the way they see fit, regardless of the feelings of the constituents who elected them.

We witness town hall events across our nation where questions and responses are scripted. If the public complains and demands questions be answered, they are pushed out of the way, locked out or, in some cases, the “meeting” is completely shut down.

Where once cabinet members were appointed by the president and approved by Congress, we now have “czars” through presidential appointment who are not approved by Congress, thus not answerable to the “governed.”

Now, we have a bill before the Senate, SB 773, which could grant our president power to control the Internet based solely on his feelings if there is a cyber threat or not.

Things are starting to look pretty bad in our government — and it’s the fault of the “governed.”

As a suggestion for the next election: If the word “incumbent” follows any candidate’s name, I recommend you vote for the other candidate, write in your vote or don’t vote at all.

It’s time to clean up our governments, local, state and federal. Force our elected officials to govern at our will instead of theirs.

Enough is enough.

• Dave Hardesty, a satellite communications engineer for Lockheed Martin and former Tracy parks and community services commissioner, is among a select group of local residents with columns in the Tracy Press.
Comments
(52)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
TomBenigno
|
September 06, 2009
Jerry:

In light of the current political picture even Jesus our LORD would have poor ratings. We need to expose those who are behind this mess. We have health care or we don't, but the way both sides are talking they want to take it all away. That's dangerous. That's just one issue.
JerryLeeLewis
|
September 05, 2009
It sounds like you think Jerry's disaproval ratings are also dropping, Tom?
Not Anonymous CN
|
September 05, 2009
Seems I embarrassed the people away....

Anyhoo...

Tom Benigno wrote:

"As I said if Mc Nerney can't cut the mustard he will need to go."

I am sure you agree that McNerney Has Not Been Cutting Mustard.... seems he is cutting up the dance floor of politics.

CN

ConcernedNeighbor
|
September 05, 2009
TB, that comment made me laugh!!

I was thinking it looks like an incomplete drawing of a "carrot" that the party is trying to lead the nation to.... unreachable.

To a gynecologist, it probably would look familiar to him/her.
TomBenigno
|
September 05, 2009
John L Lewis:

That graft looks like my last stomach ex ray. Which party made the graft?
JerryLeeLewis
|
September 05, 2009
JerryLeeLewis
|
September 05, 2009
http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama.php?
JerryLeeLewis
|
September 05, 2009
JerryLeeLewis
|
September 05, 2009
JoPlummer
|
September 04, 2009
Cute the way you phrased it.

"if Mc Nerney..."?

Gotta love this stuff.
TomBenigno
|
September 04, 2009
Jomama:

Why don't you just back up and re-think your statement your wrong again.

I have been a republican all my life, just because I help to remove Pombo from office, does not make me a democrat. As I said if Mc Nerney can't cut the mustard he will need to go.
JoPlummer
|
September 04, 2009
Tom Benigno,

Just switch parties to Democrat voter and be done with it. They will have the forms in front of Safeway in November.

Mark it down as the result of the promise of "change".

;)

Dave Hardesty
|
September 04, 2009
TomBenigno

I understood the question but perhaps you misunderstood my answer. Hey, that's OK, I am frequently misunderstood.

First of all, when I look at our government I don't look at political parties. In my mind this political party affiliation is one of the biggest problems and brings government into the realm of a sports game. That is dangerous because then the politics then becomes more important than the governing and that doesn't serve the public these elected representatives of the people are supposed to represent.

And, if you consider if incumbents are not elected and career politicians are not re-elected, in a very short period the political machine that is really the root cause of the problem dies.

To me killing the machine is what we need to do and this is what I believe is referenced in the Declaration of Independence.

What I am trying to get to is back to the basics of how our government should be run instead of the graft and favoritism that our political machine has forced us into.

I don't care which party is represented when an elected official tells his or her constituents that he or she is going to do what ever he or she wants to do regardless of the feelings of the majority of his constituency.

The object isn't the game of party politics and political one-upmanship; it's about representing the people who placed you into office.

And someone commented we might create mob rule where the majority decides to do things that are not good, things like slavery.

That's why we have a supreme court and a constitution.

Yes, I have read the lineup of party affiliations. So?

City Council races are non partisan and the local politics of our city should remain non-partisan. But I suspect, as with the rest of us, that all of our locally elected officials do have their own political affiliations.

But if we do “sweep the house,” meaning across the board completely through all government, those affiliations do not have the power they currently have today and that brings "We the people" back into their focus as something to be reckoned with instead of something to be ignored, as they decide what is best for everyone else regardless of everyone else's feelings.

Remember, during the course of American History we did not always have Democrats versus Republicans. There is no reason why we can’t change parties, destroy old ones and create new ones. As long as the people are represented by those who they elect to represent them, we don’t really need parties.

Thanks for asking the questions.

Hope you are doing well and take care of yourself. Also give my best to your wife and I hope she is doing well too.

TomBenigno
|
September 04, 2009
To add:

If you meant local government, they too have been taken over. Have you ever read the line up of party affiliations of our City Council and County Supervisors? It will blow you away.
TomBenigno
|
September 04, 2009
Dave my question was.

As I asked in my first post, what government do you want to take back. The second part of the question who do want to take it back? If you didn't understand the question, we have a two party system which party do you want to take back the country. If it's a republican party they had their chance for eight years. If it's democrats they have 3.4 years to make something happen. If it's another country you want to take over America, they already have.
JerryLeeLewis
|
September 02, 2009
"change"

'The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses.' She's got a baseball bat and she's yelling, 'you want a piece of me?' '

JerryLeeLewis
|
September 02, 2009
Hail Hitler!?!
JerryLeeLewis
|
September 02, 2009
Socialism.
TeeJay
|
September 02, 2009
Great article, Dave. These are the very things my husband and I discuss daily. Your article should be front page news in every newspaper, but of course, we know why it never will be. I can't even believe that there are STILL people that cannot see this. It is time to wake up people and see what is happening to our country. There was NO housecleaning going on...it's the same old, same old. And even worse...do some research on the Czars. It's more like like a big dump truck came and deposited the equivalent of a landfill. Obama has failed our country in less than 100 days and it is way past time for all you libs to continue to BLAME the world's problems on Bush. News Flash: BUSH IS NO LONGER THE PRESIDENT! As far as Healthcare...the gov't needs to stay out of it. They don't know how to run anything. No Public Option...but yes, reform is needed. We need to get back to Dr. and Patient decide...not gov't, not ins. co., not a panel. I'm just sick over what is going on with just about everything. You all should be too. If you're not, then you need to get your head out of...the sand.


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.