Your Voice: Cut services before making burden bigger
by Robert Tanner, Tracy
Jun 23, 2009 | 1213 views | 11 11 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
EDITOR,

The City Council voted to add new fees and “cost recovery” for paramedic calls made by the fire department. These new fees may or may not be paid by insurance companies. If not paid through insurance, then one may have to think twice about calling for help.

The same could go for car crash “cost recovery.” Will firefighters be “paid” two or three times, once by the city and then by the drivers involved? What happens if the drivers cannot pay? Does the city take their home? Will the “membership fee” cover car crashes, too?

What next, cost recovery on fire calls?

Our property taxes pay for fire and police services. So now Tracy citizens pay twice.

If the rural and Mountain House areas reject the new fees, we are stuck. While people are being laid off, the City Council raises costs instead of cutting costs. Maybe it is time to consider cuts in fighfighters and police. Other cities are doing it — maybe Tracy should, too.

Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
why?
|
June 27, 2009
No, but you can file a Lawsuit against the city of Tracy. Our health, safety and welfare is at risk!
ebflo
|
June 27, 2009
This is an interesting issue because it was discussed at two City Council Meetings, one in May and one in June. I've watched the tapes from both meetings on Channel 26 and I'll be darned if only 3-5 people stood up to voice an opinion on this issue. One was in favor of this effort with a recommendation to be fair to those less fortunate and four were opposed.

At the time, apparently either this issue wasn't important enough for anyone to take a few minutes out of their evening to come out and voice their opinion;

or,

We're really not interested in finding solutions to the challenges that face us.

Either way, I for one applaud the City for at least trying to find a solution to these difficult issues.

Whether it's providing an incentive for buying a new car or trying to recover a cost that is driven by those who use a service as opposed to everyone paying more for increased costs of services they never use.

I also applaud Council Member Abercrombie for standing up and voicing his opinion by providing a no vote. I think more of us should come to the Council meetings and speak up if we don't like the way things are going, rather than criticizing everyone for trying to solve the problems that face us.

I realize we all have an opinion, and under the First Amendment we all have a right to voice our opinion, but come-on... If you've got good ideas and you want to be heard do the democratic thing and show up at a Council meeting and argue your point where it will do some good.

JerryAutricity
|
June 27, 2009
U canooo fire fiters wid fire

U musbe on krak
why?
|
June 26, 2009
If they cant provide the services we are paying them for FIRE them all!
JerryAutricity
|
June 25, 2009
Use da $$$ 2 by da nu citey amulalencees
wishfully
|
June 25, 2009
"fortheunderdog";

Agreed, but how about a citizen proposal to turn the tide of city spending? Instead of building YET-two-more new firestations, lets ask the US Army Recuiters (in the mall), to start an Army Medic Training Center? The US Navy has air medics, too. Our US military have an opportunity to fill a gap and expand their exposure. Surely they wouldn't mind stabilizing and re-routing a real-time-field victem twice a day?
why?
|
June 25, 2009
26% cuts in the civic budget are a fiscal fact.What else will they be pimping?
shelly13
|
June 24, 2009
Jerry, ebonics, text style writing or what? I feel like I'm reading something from Fat Alberts buddy...what's his name???
JerryAutricity
|
June 24, 2009
whocares

whyUnuts dis da Bostn teaparty

wecares

why?
|
June 24, 2009
Double Taxation is the name of the Game!Our tax dollars already pay for emergency service, fire, police. Will we be charged for a police response?

The legality of their new charges for 911 is in question.

fortheunderdog
|
June 24, 2009
It appears that my comments of being taxed twice is starting to catch on.

To the writer: If you read this Wednesday's Press, there's an article about two new fire stations in the works that will cost the city $8 million to build. The fire chief has said there were 6,200 calls for fire service in 2008. If the calls remain constant, the city will have repaid it's coffer the $8 million in just over 4 years with the $300 fees.

How much confidence do you have in our city government now?


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.