Cameras to go in schools, and new transit station
by Jennifer Wadsworth
Jun 11, 2009 | 1144 views | 6 6 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Four or five cameras will be put at the downtown transit station within a year of its November opening. Press file photo
Four or five cameras will be put at the downtown transit station within a year of its November opening. Press file photo
slideshow
Tracy plans to use $100,000 in state bond money to buy and install four or five security cameras at the under-construction Tracy Transit Station.

That’s 10 times more per camera than what a local school district intends to pay for theirs this coming year.

Tracy Unified School District is figuring out how many surveillance cameras it can buy with $500,000 of a $43.1 million bond voters approved last fall to fix up the city’s oldest schools. Cindy Minter, who’s in charge of technology for the district, said she’s looking to buy 200 cameras to install at 20 Tracy schools. That’s 200 more than they have now — the only district buildings with video surveillance are the district offices.

Money for the city’s cameras comes from $20 billion in bond debt voters passed in 2006 to pay for new roadways and improve public transportation. Tracy transportation planners have yet to decide what types of cameras, monitors and software to buy, said city management analyst Ed Lovell.

“That’s something we’ll look into a little later, at least when we have the money in our hands,” Lovell said. “It’s on its way, we’ve been approved, but it’s not actually here yet.”

Construction on the $12 million train and bus station is expected to finish in mid-November. That’s when Lovell said the city will start shopping around for cameras. It’s safe to say that they’ll get installed both inside and outside the station within a year it opening, he added.

In the meantime, the city has to decide exactly how much it should spend on each camera, whether they’ll be fixed or mobile, how much they should zoom in on things and what type of software should go along with them. Lovell said the city will consider how much surveillance tape will need to be stored and whether to buy software that would flag suspicious activity.

“There are a lot of variables,” he said. “Depending on what you need them to do, the price could fluctuate. But we’re looking at four or five for the transit station.”

The most expensive part of buying security cameras is buying the software to store the footage, said Minter, who has researched surveillance cameras for three years now, ever since the district started tossing around the idea of another school bond.

“For cameras, you can pay anywhere from $1,000 to $25,000 or more,” she said. “But for storage, well that can easily take you up into the $100,000 range.”

The cameras have to be of a high enough quality that they’d identify an intruder from far away or at night, she said.

“Otherwise, what’s the point?” she asked. “You don’t want to capture some blurry shape — you want to see the person’s face.”

Ideally, she said there would be 500 surveillance cameras in Tracy Unified. The district plans to apply for school safety grants to supplement the bond money.

•Contact Tracy Press reporter Jennifer Wadsworth at 830-4225 or jwadsworth@tracypress.com.

Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
why?
|
June 12, 2009
How much traffic will the 12.5mil BUS STATION generate?
ConcernedNeighbor
|
June 12, 2009
Yes, put in cameras in the classrooms, perhaps less text messaging will take place?
ConcernedNeighbor
|
June 12, 2009
Carpets? You're kidding me, right? Carpets are the worst thing to have inside a building!

If I were a TEACHER, I would take safety of the children over the appearance of the floors!!!

How does one keep carpets clean after all those feet trampling through the halls....

Safety of the teachers, staff, and children, FIRST?
cemnut
|
June 12, 2009
AS a teacher in TUSD I can say that I would much rather see that bond money spent on carpet and paint then cameras. All the schools need a freshening up!

monsterdad3k
|
June 12, 2009
"Lovell said the city will consider how much surveillance tape will need to be stored and whether to buy software that would flag suspicious activity."

Obviously this guy has no clue. Tape????

Modern surveillance cameras are all recorded on DVRs and the footage is stored on hard drives, in RAID configurations for large storage needs. Monitors are all flat screens now. Typically you only keep footage of an event. The remainder can be discarded. One small building doesn't require that much storage. Put the DVR on a network and you can remote access the DVR if there is an event and save the video footage. Why wait until the transit station is built? It will surely cost more to install after construction is completed. Why not take bids on the project now? $100,000 seems rather expensive for four or five cameras in one tiny building. I'll put in a bid for that project for $100,000, no problem.
FrancisHineman
|
June 11, 2009
I worked at a company that had cameras on the roof and their security showed me they could see for miles around. These cameras equipped with special storage software integrated into a TCP/IP network can play-back the color of your eye at night from a remote computer's monitoring station's location. Will it be tied into the Tracy Police Dept's call-center?



We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.