Jefferson Elementary School District needs $3 million for construction costs
by Denise Ellen Rizzo
Jun 14, 2014 | 5583 views | 4 4 comments | 26 26 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Jefferson School campus at Chrisman and Linne roads will be demolished in June top make way for construction of a new campus slated to be completed in August 2015.  Glenn Moore/Tracy Press
The Jefferson School campus at Chrisman and Linne roads will be demolished in June top make way for construction of a new campus slated to be completed in August 2015. Glenn Moore/Tracy Press
Jefferson School District needs to sell more bonds from Measure J to finish construction at Jefferson and Traina schools.

During a special school board meeting on May 29, Superintendent James Bridges informed the district trustees that the district did not have the funds it needed to complete the two jobs, citing unforeseen construction costs that put the projects at a deficit.

“What’s happened in this project is that with Jefferson sitting in the county, we don’t have sewer lines, we don’t have water lines at the school site, we don’t have fire suppression on the campus,” he said. “There is a lot they have to do on a county site school as opposed to a city site, where you can connect to the basic services. The site prep is costing close to $7 million, which is much larger than a school being built in a city limit.”

Cleanup of the Jefferson School site is expected to begin in the next week or two, with demolition slated for early to mid-August.

Due to the construction delays, the opening date of the new Jefferson School campus of August 2015 will likely be delayed.

“I think September-October (completion) is more realistic,” Bridges said. “A lot is going to depend on the weather next year. If they are able to build all the time like it was this year, we should probably open August 2015. If we have a rainy year, that’s what’s going to push us back.”

Bridges told board members on May 29 that they could work with the money they had and cut out the Traina gymnasium project or they could sell more bonds.

One trustee, Pete Carlson, questioned how the students could go from having a gymnasium to going without one on campus.

“That’s unacceptable,” Trustee Debbie Wingo said of eliminating the gymnasium.

According to Bridges, Traina has a building with a stage that serves as a cafeteria, but it has no buildings with indoor basketball or volleyball courts. Building a gym would give students a separate place for athletic competitions, he said.

The board voted unanimously on May 29 to keep the Traina project on the priority list.

According to Bridges, the district has accessed only about $30 million of the $35.4 million Measure J bond passed by Jefferson voters in 2010.

Due to an economic decline, the district was initially unable to sell the remaining bonds. A new evaluation of the district has shown that it can complete the bond sales at no additional cost to the taxpayers, the superintendent said.

“What we’re looking to doing is selling an additional bond from that, approximately $3 million,” he said.

The board has scheduled two public hearings on the bond sale, this Tuesday and July 15. Officials hope to sell the bond in early August.

“I think that the board made a good choice (to keep the Traina gym project), because what they did will benefit all the students in the school district, assuring they all have a good education,” Bridges said. “It requires us to go after and sell those additional bonds, but it will benefit all students, and that’s what really needed to happen.”

• Contact Denise Ellen Rizzo at or 830-4225.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
June 16, 2014
Red flag! They just started and they are 3mil in the hole. Someone is not doing there homework. Time to clean house and start fresh. Maybe find someone that knows what a well and septic is.
June 15, 2014
Considering the district should be saving over $1M by housing Jefferson school at the Hawkins campus for the upcoming school year, this is quite curious indeed! I encourage people to attend the upcoming meetings - so few people have attended in the past.
June 14, 2014
So, you just decided to look at a map and somebody realized that the school wasn't in this city? Super smart.
June 14, 2014
I try to be understanding of some errors in planning and in estimating costs but the errors mentioned in the article are so basic and large that I have to agree with you. How the reality of the school being in the county rather than the city can be "unforeseen" is mind-boggling. I am also amazed by the fact that nobody is being held accountable/fired for their ineptitude. To make that basic of an error the project manager would have to be bozo the clown and have received his PMP certification from some random guy standing on the corner outside of a bar in Tijuana. Alternatively, and more likely, the powers that be knew from day one that the cost would be higher and are just picking something out of the air to blame it on, rather than themselves.

We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at