Eaton Avenue residents unhappy with updated medical center plans
by Denise Ellen Rizzo
Nov 01, 2013 | 5022 views | 3 3 comments | 89 89 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Consultant David Romano showed a small group of residents plans for the new Eaton Medical Plaza at 441 Eaton Avenue during a community meeting at Sutter Tracy Community Hospital on Wednesday, Oct. 30. Denise Ellen Rizzo/Tracy Press
Consultant David Romano showed a small group of residents plans for the new Eaton Medical Plaza at 441 Eaton Avenue during a community meeting at Sutter Tracy Community Hospital on Wednesday, Oct. 30. Denise Ellen Rizzo/Tracy Press
slideshow
Residents near Eaton Medical Plaza aren’t happy with changes to the plans to rebuild the center unveiled Wednesday, Oct 30, at a community meeting hosted by Sutter Gould Medical Foundation.

The alterations to the new plaza at 441 W. Eaton Ave. were inspired by community feedback from an Oct. 3 meeting, according to David Romano, real estate consultant from Modesto-based Newman-Romano.

“We tried to implement some of the changes,” he told a group of about 15 residents inside Sutter Tracy Community Hospital, 1420 N. Tracy Blvd.

Sutter Gould plans to raze the 29,000-square-foot plaza to make way for a new 45,000-square-foot building on the tree-shaded parking lot of the existing structure.

“We’re trying to be as sensitive as we can with the design,” Romano said.

He said planners have moved dumpsters so they are farther from homes and added an 8-foot-wall behind the building to act as a buffer to neighboring homes. To keep cars off Eaton Avenue, the revised plan calls for 252 parking spaces instead of the city standard of 228 spots.

Pete Mitracos, an area resident and member of the Tracy planning commission, said the designs still do not resolve all of the concerns expressed by neighbors. He said Sutter Gould should consider putting the building at the corner of Eaton and Bessie avenues.

“Nothing has changed,” he said. “Let’s be honest, if you lived here, you would not use this design. It’s designed for Gateway, not this neighborhood. You’re not improving the neighborhood by moving the building.”

Romano believes the project “would not detract from the neighborhood.”

One woman said her neighbor, who lives next to the medical center lot, would lose her sunlight in the shadow of the proposed two-story building.

“It would be a big difference to their view,” she said.

The proposed $20 million facility is designed to accommodate 20 to 24 physicians in family practice, internal medicine and pediatrics.

Romano said Sutter Gould has not yet submitted plans to the city and didn’t anticipate doing so for a month or two.

Another issue that was raised Oct. 3 was the desire to save a century-old oak tree in the present parking lot.

Romano called the tree “unique and substantial” and said foundation officials heard the neighbors’ requests and met with an arborist. He said they had arranged to transplant the tree elsewhere on the property.

He said Sutter Gould planned to consider all of the residents’ comments from Wednesday night but didn’t anticipate having any more neighborhood meetings.

Romano said residents who still had concerns could voice them during the city review process.

• Contact Denise Ellen Rizzo at 830-4225 or drizzo@tracypress.com.

 
Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Ornley_Gumfudgen
|
November 02, 2013
"They are probably concerned about their home values decreasing dramatically . . . "

An thair ya have it folks, th very same reason why th Joe Wilson pool is in th shape it's in an why th city has been unable ta establish a new project ta replace it.

Note: One of th very early first attempts ta replace th Joe Wilson pool was to do it with a modern facility built on th site of th Joe Wilson pool. Fifteen or so influential neighbors managed ta get that idea canned fer th rest of th city an it seems th same attitude prevails with th expansion of medical offices along Eaton.

Th people have changed, th project has changed but th reasons used as ta why it shouldn't be allowed ta happen are exactly th same. Interestin!

me-here
|
November 01, 2013
Not everyone in that neighborhood is unhappy with the site for construction of medical offices. Only 15 at the meeting....my house has 5 in the household that looks forward to the new office complex planned. We're just not able to make meetings to discuss.

I know we are not alone in wanting this improvement in our neighborhood and it's being close to the Hospital.
landingapproach
|
November 01, 2013
Well you may be in the minority because 15 people versus 1 is a huge difference. They are probably concerned about their home values decreasing dramatically if more medical is built. After all, who would ever want to live next to a medical building with traffic, noise, pollution. Most people want peace and a safe place to raise their children instead of being next to a place where strangers are going in 5 days a week.


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.