STOCKTON — The judge in the case of a Tracy woman charged with murdering and raping 8-year-old Sandra Cantu has recused himself from the case.
The San Joaquin County Superior Court's presiding judge issued a brief statement Monday, saying only that, "The Honorable Terrence Van Oss has recused himself." No explanation was given for the move.
Superior Court Judge Linda Lofthus will take up the case Friday. That's when Melissa Huckaby's public defender, Sam Behar, is expected to ask to remove the slain 8-year-old's remains from the Tracy Mausoleum for a second autopsy.
Huckaby is charged with one count of murder with three special circumstances: kidnapping, rape with a foreign object and lewd or lascivious conduct with a child under 14.


For those of us who are parents, aunts, uncles, grandparents, etc...we think of our own children and can only imagine what suffering and horror Sandra experienced in the last moments of her life. It's difficult to ignore a crime of this nature against an innocent child, particularly when you see the video tape that shows her skipping down the street with such joy and innocence, just moments before she is killed.
We teach our children what a stranger is and how to avoid being a victim of a crime and then we see cases like this where the accused is someone that the family knows.
In the end our opinions won't change what happens to MH...the evidence and courts will determine her faith. As parent, aunt, uncles and grandparents, etc....we now have one more thing to worry about. The face of danger has changed. Now we must rethink how to educate our children about strangers. In hopes that no child endures what Sandra did.
I agree and see your point. Problem is; the overwhelming voice in these comments is not one of intellect. (by these, I mean pretty much every Sandra related article)
I try to stay away from words, like everyone, everybody, never, always, since it does not apply to each person commenting on the blogs. There are intelligent commentors who want to make Tracy better.
Granted there were some who want to crucify just about anyone, but this is pretty serious case and they are frightened it may happen to their families, too. Look at this like a "therapy board". We can learn alot from each commentors? Lots of differing points of view. We look for the best ones, don't we, always?
Oh well, Mood Gorning to all of you.
Just too ming boggling at the depravity of human being, especially a woman, taking advantage of innocent children.
Been reported to have started fires, one to "frame" a person... as reported in "BlinkonCrime".
Just wondering how well she will fool the defendant?
I understand she'll get a fair trail. I was referring to the people here. I understand everyone can have an opinion, and I wasn't trying to say they couldn't. I hope that Melissa is punished for her crimes as well.
The point I was trying to make is that everyone in the comments here is acting no better then the ruthless killer they believe she is.
I understand what she did (if she did it) was horrible. But that doesn't mean we have to stoop to her level, at least verbally.
I believe what was said is that children explore, and what feels good, they do, and sometimes they do explore together, each other, and its done all over the world, and considered normal, if its just curiosity, so get a grip in the world, if you are a Mom. Abuse was referred to I believe, as "What if there was possible physical touching, physical molestation, previously by a family member of Sandra's,,,,,,,,,,,,that would also be why a lawyer would need to do a thorough autopsy. in just trying to uncover every stone for their client. It turns out today, that request was taken back. The spin is that unless someone else is going to be named along with Melissa, or Melissa had to cover up for someone,,,,,,,,,,,yes, including her own child if there was an accident, that there will be a plea of insanity. Read your info correctly.
This was a comment for those who post sickening ideals about Sandra and her truama. You people need counseling and do some research on sexual exploitation.
Very sorry for what happened to Sandra.
City council members, for example, recuse themselves on neighborhood plans (re-zoning, evaluating enivornmental impact, etc...) when they own property in the neighborhood.
A judge might recuse his/herself because they are friends of the defendant or DA in the case. If they lost a child to murder. If they are involved in an investment with one of the defense or prosecution team. Anything that would give the appearance of impropriety, and taint the case.
City counc
You mean this?
« ConcernedNeighbor wrote on Tuesday, Apr 21 at 02:12 PM »
I suggest an "Amber Alert" sign for within the city of Tracy, when a child goes missing for unreasonable length of time according to the parent/parents. For more urgent case requiring state attention, formal amber alert would have been issued?
just thinking of ways to protect the child within the city during early stage of disappearance...
definitely not bashing the PD, just hoping for better response and rescue time in the search within the city...
If, so, I sure hope the city can work with that idea?
I like it!
Would love to see some ideas on how to make Tracy safer for children in memory of Sandra Cantu/Chavez?
I am sure the judge is following the letter of the law in recusing himself, otherwise the case would be null and void?
Has anyone heard how Sandra's family is doing lately? I am hoping the readers will not forget the family's suffering for as long as this case last.