Callers have inundated the phone lines of Tracy police, saying it can't be. Veteran homicide and sex-crime researchers say they cannot recall a case quite like it. Even the investigators themselves looked at the evidence and initially said "no way."
A woman was accused not only of killing someone else's child, but of raping her
Law enforcement officials and other experts say the allegations against Melissa Huckaby in the slaying of 8-year-old Sandra Cantu are remarkably rare over decades of U.S. police work.
Huckaby was charged Tuesday with murdering her daughter's playmate, with the added special circumstances of rape with a foreign object, lewd or lascivious conduct with a child under 14 and murder in the course of a kidnapping. The 28-year-old divorced mother is due back in court Friday, when she is expected to enter a plea.
Sandra's body was found on April 6 — 10 days after she went missing. It was stuffed in a suitcase that was pulled from an irrigation pond near Tracy, a small town where San Francisco's suburbs meet California's farm belt.
Tracy police Sgt. Tony Sheneman said dozens of callers a day have insisted that Huckaby could not have acted alone, that no mother would rape another's child, that the scenario was too improbable to be true. The case is so striking that police initially shared the public's reaction.
The investigators themselves, when first confronted with the evidence that pointed to Huckaby, were inclined to look for another suspect.
"When investigators were first looking at this they went 'Huh, no way... Who did she work with?'" Sheneman said. "We got that info and said 'there's no way, that doesn't happen.'"
"After this case, I'll never say never again," Sheneman said, adding that police remain confident that Huckaby acted alone.
Department of Justice data on U.S. homicides dating back more than 30 years highlight the unusual nature of this crime, said James Fox, a criminologist at Northeastern University.
Of the more than 600,000 cases recorded — more than 90 percent of U.S. homicides since 1976 — only one comes close to the alleged circumstances of Sandra's killing, said Fox. The data did not include names and some other details; the Associated Press was unable to locate the case.
Researchers say the Huckaby case does not match the typical profile of sex crimes by females.
Women represent only 1 percent of all adult arrests for forcible rape and 6 percent of all adult arrests for other sex offenses, according to a Department of Justice report.
When they do commit sex crimes, women often are acting as accomplices to men, and their victims tend to be teenagers, said David Finkelhor, director of the University of New Hampshire Crimes against Children Research Center.
"It's very, very rare for women to molest children, and when they molest children it's very unusual for them to molest a child of this age," Finkelhor said. "It's unusual for women to kill children who are not their own."
Police have declined to publicly state where and how Sandra was killed, but they have said they do not have a motive.
"I find it really hard to speculate on the motivation," Finkelhor said.
Court documents and interviews with family members show Huckaby had a rocky personal life. She went through a divorce and bankruptcy and fought depression as she tried to hold down a job and raise a child.
In 2002, she won a restraining order against a boyfriend who had an extensive criminal record and a restraining order from a previous marriage, according to San Joaquin County court records.
She married John Huckaby in 2003, separated a year later and divorced in 2005. In divorce papers, Melissa Huckaby accused John Huckaby of child abduction, domestic violence and alcohol abuse — allegations he denied in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America" on Friday.
Records show she was arrested in November and charged with burglary and petty theft from a store. The judge suspended the case and appointed a doctor to assess Huckaby's mental health. She was found competent to stand trial. In a deal with prosecutors, she pleaded no contest in January to the petty theft charge and the burglary charge was dropped.
Huckaby's attorneys could use the sheer statistical improbability of the murder case to cast doubt on the allegations, regardless of the evidence, legal experts said.
"Instinctively it doesn't feel like a good fit," said William Portanova, a Sacramento defense lawyer and a former state and federal prosecutor.
"It's an extraordinarily rare circumstance to have an adult female commit a sexual assault and murder on a female child alone," Portanova said. "So right off the bat, any attorney is going to be looking to disprove that theory."

Hopefully some of the people calling the police station will read what diatrib wrote in that last post and stop calling the police every day so they can do their job more effectively.
Unlikely doesn't mean impossible.
Also, yes this does happen with women alone, I think that because of how skeptical people are about women committing these acts alone that I believe they are not looked into properly and prosecuted. It happend to my cousin when she was 3 and no one believed my aunt, even though my cousin showed them what had happend.
I don't like to think about this but, I wonder if she drugged the children (including the other reported case of drugging) so they wouldn't remember and then something went wrong with Sandra? Poor little girl.
As for child abductors in general I read something once that said that they questioned a number of child abductors and molesters and the common thread is that they look for the one's whose parents don't look like they are paying attention. It's profiling children. So everyone please watch your children and their interactions with adults. If you have a concern then pay attention to that... A parent's intuition is a powerful thing.
In most of the cases I am referencing they lacked physical evidence and often if it existed at all the results in court still went against the victim. There is a body here so I don't think that will happen. People forget that. Too many Californians feel they have been screwed in the courts. Especially criminal courts and feel like the public should be allowed more info. Like it is owed.
Sorry but the info is classified until they choose to release it.
As for watching your children, I agree with you. A lot of posters said that Sandra should have been able to go to a friends house alone or that because she was 8 she was able to be alone, etc. Or that it is the predators that need to be stopped. I agree with them to the point that a child SHOULD be able to do that and it's not fair that we can't just go to a house without the risk of being hurt. But, the point is even though you have the right to go as you please, these people are out there, they aren't going away. It's not that I don't trust my kids nor do I want them living in a shell of fear either but it's the other guy I don't trust. I don't instill fear in my own kids, I just keep my eye on them as much as I possibly can. Sometimes though, you just never know. I am upset that the January incident didn't get told to the community there. That would have been a great red flag, whether true or not. Parents would at least have been aware of her.
To hmmm...I heard a news report that stated MH swallowed razor blades and that was why her stomach was bleeding. Never heard about it after that though.
It is actually a front in this case- I believe and I'm sure others around the country would agree with me.
Also, if there was more than one person involved-all would be equally guilty anyway. At least in the public's eyes.
If people with inside knowledge are posting here, there is not point in disputing them.
None of the rest of us have that knowlege.
Beyond that you put your faith in LE and the justice system or not. Some people just don't or won't and it just seems very hard to change someone's view on that.
Our nation has been deluged with damages from the monsters raised in fanatical environs. We've been lucky, now with the fanatical religious families homeschooling their broods, the problems will multiply in the tens of thousands once these children get sent out into the world due to their honed mindsets of feeling superior and entitled over the "other".
Kinda sounds like a lot of Arab nations and their teachings doesn't it? I noticed in your posts condemnations of the Jewish and Christians, but you failed to mention the biggest producer of religious fanatics and the atrocities they are responsible for.
I agree with your point that the repressive environment of some religious groups can be as bad as having no religion at all.
Much of the evidence will be sketchy as to what the judge will take or throw out due to faulty Police work...
It is clear that there are some FANATICAL people here but they aren't necessarily the "religious" ones. As for no disparaging remarks towards religion and faith that isn't true. Read your own comments people. Honestly now not all people who home school are religious zealots either, some homeschool because they've seen the village and don't want them raising their children, present case in point.
I will say I am not religious I believe in God, I serve in my church and my faith does not make me simpleminded nor would I say that of anyone I attend church with on a regular basis. I will also say that anyone is capable of sin, not just "religious" people. There are religious fanatics out there but to suggest that this woman committed this despicable crime based on fanatical religion and faith is preposterous, UNLESS THIS Baptist church has a belief system far removed from all others. I don't attend the church she did, do you? I don't know their tenants of faith, do you?
As you stated yourself our country has these issues more than others, perhaps that is do to our own cultural and societal issues more than "religion".
I don't necessarily see the intelligent discussion on "religion" as much as an attack and witch hunt on "religious" people, faith and religious upbringing.
Watch it your bias is showing.
As usual, a knee-jerked response to the original poster's observations focused on religion vs the entire discourse's focus on FANATICAL religious upbringings.
The same word for faith and belief: "credinţă", from the latin "credo" which is defined as "retarded". Faith has a nasty tendency to make bumbling simpletons of mankind who we see here on this thread had a "faithful" let her faith edit out the "fanatic" element in the original discussion
"Faith" is a word used by and for religious machinations making it a virtue to be credulous and gullible
~ and we did witness this phenomena here on the thread by a poster who is so gullible to faith that she/he edits out entire words and thought whilst reading.
I still cannot see a disparaging post against religion as a whole, I did see intelligent discourse regarding fanatical religious upbringing.
Our nation has been deluged with damages from the monsters raised in fanatical environs. We've been lucky, now with the fanatical religious families homeschooling their broods, the problems will multiply in the tens of thousands once these children get sent out into the world due to their honed mindsets of feeling superior and entitled over the "other".
There are some very sick people out there in this world we live in. This article isn't about religion... and this is not a religious issue. This is an issue about a woman who obviously has some real problems and a poor little girl no longer being with us. Also just because someone goes to church doesn't mean they believe in or know God, crazy as that sounds. Not even every Sunday school teacher. If this woman did kill her in the church as some are suggesting what does that suggest about her beliefs to you? I think the fact that she taught Sunday school made it more shocking to everyone... not more probable.
This whole religious people are more likely argument is off.
It is like saying we are investigating a disease people get that we have no cure for and trying to find the cause so less people get the disease. You can gather alot of facts but just because something comes up in the profile of some patients doesn't make it the cause.
Honestly now.
If the doctor who created the profile questioned these people and included in the detail that 72% of these people said their favorite color was blue would you then say that we should be wary of people who liked the color blue!