Your Voice: Unleashed dogs present danger
Jul 19, 2013 | 1790 views | 0 0 comments | 125 125 recommendations | email to a friend | print

I was disappointed that when I called 911 on Sunday, July 7, to report that three dogs, two of them large, were allowed by their owners to run free at Clyde Bland Park, I was given the brush-off by the dispatcher.

I was asked, "What are the dogs doing?"

I replied, "They are not on leashes. That is against the law." (It's in Tracy's municipal code.)

The dispatcher asked again, a little more exasperated, "But what are they doing?"

I tried, unsuccessfully, to explain that this situation could be disastrous. I say this as someone who, some years ago, could only watch as an enormous Rottweiler, off leash, attacked my German shepherd. Sure, it turned out OK — about $1,000 in veterinary bills later.

I have to wonder what bank robbery or terrorist attack the police were occupied with at 8 a.m. on a Sunday morning so that my call for assistance was judged to be too trivial to be taken seriously. I also have to wonder what training, if any, is given to our police department regarding the destructive behavior of certain dumb animals. By that, I am referring not to dogs, but to their thoughtless owners who let them run free in public places. The disgusting dog poop issue aside, I mean the risk to the humans and on-leash dogs trying to make legal use of public areas.

I held my tongue while speaking to the dispatcher, but wanted to say, "I'm sorry to bother you. Shall I call you back after there's blood flying all over the place?"

The owners who let their large dogs run off leash were breaking the law and causing a dangerous situation. That, in itself, as far as I'm concerned, was valid enough reason for assistance.

Carl H. Dellanno, Tracy
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at