Public pick of patrol
by Denise Ellen Rizzo
Sep 27, 2012 | 5182 views | 5 5 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The San Joaquin Sheriff’s Department will choose between these two car styles for their next fleet of patrol vehicles.  Courtesy photo
The San Joaquin Sheriff’s Department will choose between these two car styles for their next fleet of patrol vehicles. Courtesy photo
Following Ford Motor Company’s decision to discontinue the Ford Crown Victoria — a favorite among law enforcement agencies — the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department is choosing a replacement. And the department wants the public’s help.

Sheriff Steve Moore has asked county residents to visit the department website and pick the car they like most between pursuit versions of the Chevy Caprice and Ford Taurus.

“We’re having them choose which vehicle and graphics they want patrolling their neighborhood,” Sheriff’s spokesman Les Garcia said. “We want their input.”

The two cars are similar in body shape and graphics. The most obvious difference is the Caprice is all black, while the Taurus has white doors and the word “Sheriff” written backward on its windshield, so that it’s visible in a rearview mirror.

Garcia said once the votes are in, the winner will eventually replace the department’s fleet of 60 Crown Victorias.

The last Crown Victorias rolled off the Ford manufacturing line in September 2011.

According to a report by CNNMoney, the demand for fuel-efficient vehicles made for the end of the large, heavy cars that have been used by law enforcement for years.

Attempts by the Tracy Press to contact Ford officials this week were unsuccessful.

Since production of the Crown Victoria police interceptors ended a year ago this month, the sheriff’s department isn’t the only law enforcement agency facing the dilemma of replacing a fleet of patrol cars.

Tracy police and California Highway Patrol are also looking to purchase new makes and models.

According to Eric Lamoureux of the state department of general services, which is the purchasing arm for California government, the CHP has contracted with Ford for a sedan based on the Taurus and an SUV based on the Explorer. He said the replacement of hundreds of patrol cars across the state will be phased in as new cars are needed.

Although an SUV is an unusual choice for a patrol vehicle, Lamoureux said CHP cars are different from the average police car.

He said CHP cars must be able to carry 1,500 pounds of equipment, including radios, light bars and firearms. He said the SUV meets those weight requirements, with room for four fully equipped officers.

Many officers have only driven a Crown Victoria on patrol, and many admit being partial to the status quo.

“I prefer the Crown Victoria myself,” Tracy-area CHP spokesman Adam Shelton said. “I think it’s a great patrol car, but it’s not going to be there anymore. It’s been a quality vehicle for what it is. They’re a safe vehicle — they’ve been durable.”

Over the years, Shelton said the CHP has used other makes and models on patrol, including the Capri, Volvos, Camaros, and Mustangs, but none have patrolled the roadways as long or as frequently as the Crown Victoria.

The Tracy Police Department will eventually need to replace its cars, but delayed the day of reckoning with a purchase of 10 Crown Victoria police interceptors before Ford stopped production, according to Lt. Dave Sant.

He said two of the old patrol cars are having equipment stripped and placed into one of the new Crown Victorias. The first of those cars is expected to hit the streets in three weeks.

“We’re doing two (cars) at a time,” Sant said. “Replacing the 2006-2007 (cars) with the 2011 models, they’ll look identical to what we have now.”

The 10 cars will be phased in as needed, Sant said. After that, department officials will begin discussions about replacements for their fleet of 31 patrol cars. Since Tracy patrol cars are similar to CHP, he said imagines the department will watch closely what vehicles pass the CHP test.

“It’s too early to look at replacements,” Sant said. “We knew they wouldn’t make the Crown Victoria forever. Many of the components (molded rear seats, cages and push bars) don’t fit different car models, and it can cost $3,500 to $7,000 more to make it fit … (We’ll) see what can and can’t be translated into the new models.”

• Contact Denise Ellen Rizzo at 830-4225 or

At a glance

•s To vote on a new vehicle for the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department, visit at

Comments-icon Post a Comment
September 30, 2012
Bring back the Ford Fairlane.

September 29, 2012
I haz sad. Neither of those can even come close to what the crown vic was. It is an absolute shame that Ford killed it. I cant imagine what they were thinking. The crown vic was the last real car on the road, being the last one with body on frame construction, which is far superior to the unibody crap.
September 30, 2012

I rarely agree with ya but in this case yer spot on correct. Gonna be difficult ta come up with somethang ta replace the Crown Vic. Perhaps, in th interest of fuel, we ought ta equip em with unicycles an complain like mad that they aren't doin thair jobs. Seems ta be th state of affairs these days.
September 30, 2012
Forced to chose between these two I would say they should go with the Taurus. It at least has an AWD option. We should not subject or police to having to drive front (i.e. wrong) wheel drive.
October 03, 2012

Again I agree with ya. Law enforcement really needs rear wheel drive, all wheel drive at th very least. It's a safety issue really as they perform thair jobs. Few people understand th physics of why but our law enforcement personnel have a good understandin of it. It's a shame that th zeal fer savin money takes precedent over providin them what they really need ta do thair job as safe as possible.

We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at