House for homeless draws neighbors’ ire
by Joel Danoy / Tracy Press
Jun 29, 2012 | 7861 views | 76 76 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Guillermo Rodriguez asks Marvin Rothschild, director of the Coalition of Tracy Citizens to Assist the Homeless, to answer a question about the home where homeless people will live on Emerson Avenue as residents in the neighborhood vented their frustrations about the home at a gathering Wednesday, June 27.  Glenn Moore/Tracy Press
view slideshow (6 images)
A neighborhood gathering between Emerson Avenue residents and members of a homeless organization planning to open a transitional home on the street’s first block was often confrontation and contentious Wednesday, June 27.

Coalition of Tracy Citizens to Assist the Homeless recently leased the house at 26 W. Emerson Ave. and is preparing it to accept up to six men and four women on its opening day, July 1, according to coalition director Marvin Rothschild.

The homeless occupants will stay at the residence for a transitional period of about a year while they secure their own employment, income and housing. It’s the only home in Tracy that reportedly accepts single men and single women. McHenry House Family Shelter, 757 A St., only assists homeless families, no more than seven at a time.

About 20 neighbors and residents living on and around the first block of West Emerson Avenue gathered at the home Wednesday night —

following an invite by the coalition — to voice their opposition to the project.

Rothschild said the coalition organized the gathering to “explain, not justify” to concerned neighbors the purpose and goals of the project.

Guillermo Rodriguez, who lives two houses from the planned home, said the majority of neighbors at the gathering learned about the home when it was first reported by the Tracy Press on June 22.

“I’m frightened, and this is our neighborhood, and we feel that they are a threat to our neighborhood,” he said. “We have young kids, we have the elderly. We have a good neighborhood here.”

In the June 22 article, pastor Tom Bardwell — who was recruited by Rothschild to oversee the house — said the coalition chose the home after “receiving the blessing from neighbors.” He and Rothschild reportedly knocked on neighbors’ doors seeking input.

From the meeting’s start Wednesday, tempers ran high, as several neighbors vehemently denied that such a “blessing” was offered.

Many neighbors claimed they were never contacted by the two men and felt that the group misrepresented the sentiment of the neighborhood in the June 22 article.

“You’re not going to get any sympathy here, I’m sorry, about where to place your housing and helping the homeless,” said Elaine Adams, a nearby resident. “You’ve had other choices, you look at the one and maybe two, so no sympathy.”

When confronted, Bardwell said that he was misquoted in the article and that while he accompanied Rothschild, the men spoke to at least two people.

As of Thursday, June 28, Bardwell had not made a claim to the Tracy Press about being misquoted.

Rothschild said he and Bardwell visited “four or five houses next to us and around us.”

“We got some answers and some not home,” Rothschild said. “We figured that was far enough. Maybe on second hindsight, I should have gone down the block.”

When pressed further, Rothschild said, “They said OK, the man over there,” before he was cut off by angry neighbors.

Guillermo Rodriguez’s wife, Glorya, told the men, “That was not blessing.”

She and her husband presented Rothschild with a petition with more than 100 signatures against the opening of the home.

Glorya Rodriguez said the home’s future occupants — many of whom live on the streets, in vehicles or on the couches of friends and family — would pose a threat to a neighborhood that is home to children, elderly and the Tracy Learning Center, a kindergarten-to-12th-grade school, about two blocks away.

She was also concerned about potential health issues that the occupants could present, including tuberculosis.

Sue Langdon, a Coalition board member, said the group would conduct background checks and deny living space to any violent criminals, gang members or sex offenders. Tuberculosis immunizations will be given to occupants, she said.

Other strict rules governing the occupants include no drugs, alcohol or pets. The Coalition also explained that occupants would be subject to random drug tests, a curfew and nightly bed checks. A 30-day probation period during which no friends are allowed in the house will also be enforced.

Adams said an explanation from the coalition was too late.

“What we are concerned about is that we don’t want the house to be anything,” she said. “What you’re telling me now doesn’t matter, because we don’t want it. You’re talking to us after the fact.”

Several neighbors were concerned about overcrowding in the home and asked why 10 people — and a full-time live-in house manager — would be living in the single-family home. The men would be situated in the front home, while the women would live in a one-bedroom loft building in the backyard.

Alan Bell, a senior planner for the city of Tracy, said at the meeting that the home use was approved under the neighborhood’s medium-density zoning. City code dictates that as many as 16 people can live in the house and still meet fire code.

Steve Abercrombie, a Tracy city councilman, said he attended the meeting after hearing from several neighbors. He said the City Council didn’t need to approve the use of the residence because it meets city codes and ordinances.

Lee Stopka’s mother lives next door to the home, and Lee owns the property. She was upset that the city of Tracy’s codes and ordinances would allow a single-family home to be used as a boarding house.

“I know you are supposed to be helping people and that there is a need for the homeless in Tracy,” she said. “But this is not the place. They should be downtown, where the police are nearby and they are next to picking up a bus and the stores are around. That’s where they should be, and not in the middle of a residential area.”

Volunteer house manager Preston Walker told neighbors that his 23 years working with homeless, in addition to his former experience as a firefighter and Alameda County reserve deputy sheriff, made him qualified to manage the home.

He is also state certified to prepare food for the home’s occupants and said he has a doctorate in clinical psychology and a doctorate in pastoral counseling.

“When it comes to safety, that is taken care of within me” he said. “I am polished in doing this, and nobody can get past me under the influence.”

Langdon claimed that many of the neighbors were stereotyping the homeless and that the residence was for people needing temporary help, not drug addicts from the streets.

“These are good, law-abiding

citizens — I don’t think you have all the facts of who is going to be living here,” she said. “I think you have a lot of misconceived ideas of a lot of the homeless people in Tracy.”

Langdon and Rothschild each told neighbors at separate times that the coalition invited them to the house as a courtesy and the Coalition didn’t need a formal blessing from them.

Guillermo Rodriguez said he was “disappointed” that Bardwell didn’t address the crowd. Bardwell left about 45 minutes into the two-hour meeting to reportedly teach a class.

“You know what, I think everybody made up their minds after the way they (the Coalition) did this,” Rodriguez said. “I don’t want it here. The reverend especially, because he is supposed to run this and he didn’t even speak. What is that about?”

According to Rothschild, the home will open as scheduled and the possibility of single overnight stays by homeless people has been nixed.
Comments
(76)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Wobbley
|
July 05, 2012
The Fair Housing Act has deemed Alcoholic and Drug addicted patrons as "Handicapped" thus trumping any claim against 'zoning' laws.

That said, I'm not sure if the city could do anything about it anyways. My brother lives in an unmanaged 'care' facility in San Jose. It's a central location for police activity. The owners get $600 month in social security checks from each of the 20 occupants of 2 adjoining houses. Thats $12,000 a month. The occupants get 3 meals a day and that's it. Not even toilet paper is provided.

I'm not sure how this non-profit is funded.

What I don't understand is WHY in Tracy? The job market is already scarce here. Jobs are central to recovering from homelessness. So I don't see an 'out' for the people being helped.

I wish them the best of luck!
Wobbley
|
July 05, 2012
I'm pretty sure the project was funded by firework sales.
oldleathers
|
July 06, 2012
This is the answer as to why this group wants to "help" the homeless.

"The owners get $600 month in social security checks from each of the 20 occupants of 2 adjoining houses. Thats $12,000 a month. The occupants get 3 meals a day and that's it. Not even toilet paper is provided." Wobbley you nailed it!

victor_jm
|
July 04, 2012
The following excerpt appears in this article:

“Alan Bell, a senior planner for the city of Tracy, said at the meeting that the home use was approved under the neighborhood’s medium-density zoning. City code dictates that as many as 16 people can live in the house and still meet fire code.”

This is a complaint I have with our country, its leaders, and the shallow worldview held by so many people.

First, city leaders are often short-sighted. Now, hypothetically, 16 people may live in this house. Suppose each of them owned a car. Isn’t the expectation they do? Where would these 16 vehicles be parked? On the street? Would this present a fire code issue?

Boy, we want to vanquish solitude in this country, because so many of us, influenced by the dictates of economics and human propagation (and I say this about dogs, as well), want to continue piling higher and higher each of us on top of one another.

I enjoy a comfort zone between myself and my neighbors, but it is often violated. I am sure there are at least 10 humanitarians from the non-profit coalition and from the city leadership who support this effort. Why doesn’t each of them house one of the homeless people? Probab
ltlraven
|
July 03, 2012
Unfortunately I cannot quote chapter and verse but didn't Jesus say, Whatever you do unto him, you do unto me? Just sayin.
Ornley_Gumfudgen
|
July 03, 2012
Actually yer hintin around th last verses in Matthew 25. So as you have done ta th least of these my breathern you have also done unto me.

But ya know, it's mighty convenient ta look at that an feel yer right in just feedin all when some don't deserve it, which is really what most people are complainin about.

All too often we hear God tellin us about havin compassion on those who don't, not can't, work an forget what he told us in 2 Thessalonians 3:9–10 a 1 Thessalonians 4:9-12.

Then too thair's Proverb's 6:6 an Proverbs 20:4 that needs ta be reconciled as well.

Look, no doubt thair are a lot of homeless that need halp an it's right an good ta halp em. But unfortunately thair are also a lot of em just workin th system an stealin it away frum those who need it an that is what most people are complainin about when they don't want a homeless shelter next th thair homes in thair neighborhoods.

Yer comment, "... miss the small town Tracy used to be, where everyone knows your name and all your business, but I do." makes me wanna ask, really? If yer a proud mommy of 1 is thair a proud pappy of 1 in yer family fold? Hope so. "Judge not lest ye be judged."

Ornley_Gumfudgen
|
July 03, 2012
OOPS. Sorry, th mommy of one comment shouldn't have been directed ta ya, just sayin. Sorry about that.
ProudMommyOf1
|
July 03, 2012
Last time I checked the word homeless didn't mean a threat to children and elderly. To acknowledge the need to help but not there, to pass the buck to downtown seems so closed minded. If not in a residential area, maybe the homeless should be put in a concentration camp in the outskirts of town. Is that a more suitable place? Chances are there are homeless people sleeping in their cars on your street at night or they are the friend sleeping on a neighbor's couch. We live in a world where coaches, priests, and teachers are child molesters. So, while you're out there condemning homeless Joe, maybe Mr & Mrs Smith next door are abusing their in-laws, molesting their children, stealing identities and breaking into houses. Don't be so quick to judge someone, without knowing their story. That person with the questionable background may have barely escaped an abusive relationship. Or maybe they fell on some hard times and can't find a job so they lost their home of 15 years. They may just need a helping hand. Or that one person to say, "yes, you can do it," when everyone else tells then, "no, you can't, loser." It's so much easier to bring someone down than it is to lift someone up. So be
ProudMommyOf1
|
July 03, 2012
the change you wish to see in the world. As long as people continue to say it's not their problem, the worse it's going to get. Growing up, we knew our whole neighborhood. The kids were raised by the "village". Everyone watched out for each other. We helped one another. I didn't think I would ever miss the small town Tracy used to be, where everyone knows your name and all your business, but I do.
gueraloca79
|
July 02, 2012
Wow, dont get me wrong I am all for helping the less fortunate but when it came to me and my family and our health the city was no where to be found when the owner of this property neglected his responsibility to keep the residence inhabitable. And during the process I went through with code enforcement, they did nothing but "SUPPOSEDLY" issue a small fine to fix many issues this housing property had. Instead of enforcing the law they decided to sweep it under the rug and cover for the slumlord by stating he would and not be renting any more properties within city limits, and i was assured that he would face consequences and not just a slap on the wrist all the while my children became very ill due to neglect in teh home on his part, then I read this article and find out he actually faced nothing and is at it again for leasing the property for a homeless coalition.. I mean really where is the justice for the victims or families that have suffered such as mine due to slumlords like him.. Not only do i feel betrayed by the people who were supposed help my family in this but also cheated out of justice. The city reps are a bunch of liars....
aztec
|
July 01, 2012


hypocrisyhater

sorry backinblack but those who oppose know who they are! i don't need to name names they are already out there and i have no problem as i am correct and the parties that be are already embarrassed as it is....lesson: be careful who you go after...you live in a glass house! we could go back n forth on this but there are clearly no winners so why bother...all parties concerned need to look in their heart...there lies the real & truthful answer!

Are you making threats now?...lol



Anyhoo085
|
July 01, 2012
I actually found this article because I am looking for information on how to open houses such as this and the family shelter. I too was once homeless. I had a small child and had been beat by my guardian and was left out to the streets. I had no crime or addiction. I now have a passion for helping others as there was none to help me at that time in my life. Give our fellow men and women the opportunity to get their feet on some solid ground. Help with a resume, some work clothes, help with college applications and grants, help finding work and a better life. Help make the homeless population get smaller and better educated and productive members of society. Don't assume that homeless means they we bad people or made bad choices. It could be the case but from my experience with society people are victims of circumstance and need help pulling themselves out of the mud. Much love to humanity.
MissBHaven
|
July 01, 2012
Very well said!!!
Glory83
|
July 02, 2012
I am sorry to hear about your struggles with your child. This is exactly why I feel that this home would be of better use if it was for families. As I stated before, no child should ever have to go through a situation such as this one. There is a need for a home for homeless families in this area and this home on Emerson would have been a perfect opportunity to help those families. I just do not understand why these single men and women with “troubled backgrounds” would be made a priority when there are thousands of families in need. I understand that we are all humans and everyone should have help in one way or another. However I do not agree that all people are equal in this situation because children are always more important and should be helped first. If there is a chance to get an entire family off the streets, wouldn’t that benefit the homeless as well the town more versus just one person?
backinblack
|
July 01, 2012
hypocrisyhater, My compliments for responding, a lot of others who get challenged for their baseless comments simply disappear or launch personal attacks. However, you didn't really step up in full.

You made the accusation so it's not my job to back it up. As Glory83 already asked, why don't you post the names of the specific people you are referring to? If your accusations are indeed fact, if the information is public, if they were convicted and not just accused, then step up and call them out specifically for being hypocrites.

If you are correct, you shouldn't have any problems, of course if you are not correct, you may have issues with libel.
hypocrisyhater
|
July 01, 2012
sorry backinblack but those who oppose know who they are! i don't need to name names they are already out there and i have no problem as i am correct and the parties that be are already embarrassed as it is....lesson: be careful who you go after...you live in a glass house! we could go back n forth on this but there are clearly no winners so why bother...all parties concerned need to look in their heart...there lies the real & truthful answer!
sleepy2
|
June 30, 2012
hey, debbbdaves...Why do you keep bringing up 'so call Christian neighbors' ? The only ones who identify themselves as christian are Pastor Tom Bardwell and ProLife Marvin Rothchild. I reread the article to look for Holy rollers and couldn't find any.
debbdaves
|
June 30, 2012
The hypocrisy here is that those who have money and a record can thrive but those who are poor and don't necessarily have a record are shunned by their so call Christian neighbors. Wonder where in the Bible it says you can't live next to a poor person.
MissBHaven
|
June 30, 2012
I actually have to agree,there should have been a compromise. I too believe that no child should have to be on the street, nor is it their fault that they do. Do I think that this house is an excellent idea? Yes I do. Do I think that neighborhood is overreacting? Yes I do. Do I think that there should have been more communication with the neighborhood from the coalition? Absolutely! The fact still remains that we all live here and we all need to get along, throwing stones at eachother (and yes I am guilty and can admit when I am wrong) we need to find a solution to this ever growing problem (homelessness). Whether it be young or old, healthy or sick, everyone should have a safe place to live. Let's put all religion aside (again I am guilty of that as well), and ask ourselves what kind of a person do I want to be? I know that I want to help people, drug addicts, alcholics, men, women, children, elderly, it doesn't matter because they are all human beings,we all bleed the same color. Our religous beliefs may all be different, but in the end we all want the same thing, to live in a world where there is peace and nobody has to be afraid to go outside. Let's actually be proactive!
WestUSA
|
June 30, 2012
While everyone can undestand the loss of property values and need for full disclosures due to this new shelter in a residental neighborhood, others understand the need to show some compassion and provide the temporary transitional housing for the homeless.

Most homeowners are unaware that these type of "commercial ventures" can openup on their street! Rehab centers, mental health and otehr group homes, homeless shelters are but a few examples of what can intrude in your area WITHOUT LOCAL ZONING JURISDICTION! That's right, the STATE allows these uses, and the local ordinaces cannot stop them!

This factor helps understand the tradeoff to buying into a higher cost area where hopefully the rents are at such a rate that it makes these ventures cost prohibitive. However, the revenues generated for most of these licensed facilities is over $1200-1800 per person-- so they will indeed open everywhere! Nothing your local authorities can do about it--- complain to the state. --Just saying, and living it!
Tracybrian
|
June 30, 2012
Classic case of NIMBY. lets just get donations for a house in Mountian house, redbridge or Hidden lake and see what happens. lol
usn-cmc
|
June 30, 2012
When was the last time a property owner renting a house in your neighborhood consulted one or more of the neighbors about who he/she was gonna rent to? For over 3 years a convicted felon and drug dealer lived with his family 2 doors from me and I could do nothing except be vigilant. Oh, but that's what I do anyway 'cuz I consider myself a GOOD NEIGHBOR. Every time I encounter a homeless person, I remind myself, "There but by the grace of God, go I". Whatever the concerns of their neighbors, they might want to take a minute to ask "What if it were me?" If it were, wouldn't they want someone to show compassion and understanding? I know I would.
MissBHaven
|
June 29, 2012
One of the people in the audience was heard saying that he would start carrying a shotgun! So you are concerned for the safety of your children but it's alright to have someone walk around with a loaded weapon? I was outraged when I wrote my original post; however, the fact still remains that an individual threatened to carry a loaded firearm in a neighborhood, therefore, I stand by my original statement that the homeless individuals should be the ones that are afraid!
Glory83
|
June 30, 2012
I was at this meeting as well, and yes guns were mentioned on three separate occasions by three different individuals. First by a young man who did NOT mention anything about LOADED guns. In fact he stated that he was willing to “open carry” when outside of his home, which is legal in the state of California. As of now open carry of long guns is still permitted by the law. Another mention of guns was by an elderly gentleman who stated he would have his guns ready in case he needed them for protection. This is also legal. Lastly a woman stated that many of the elderly she spoke with felt threatened enough that they felt a gun was needed to protect themselves against possible intruders. Again none of these are considered criminal activity, they are all legal and protected by our second amendment right. So your claim that the homeless should be scared because concerned law abiding citizens are willing to protect their homes within the limits of the law does not hold water. Maybe you should learn the laws regarding gun ownership before trying to accuse law abiding citizens of being anything but proactive members of society.
backinblack
|
June 29, 2012
I don't have a dog in this fight but I do believe in truth, justice, and the American way. Please Mr. or Mrs. hypocrisyhater, provide evidence to support your allegations against those who oppose having a homeless shelter in their neighborhood.

Here's a little FYI, unless you can back up your comment I suggest you shut up. What is the basis for your comment? Is it the pictures? If so, you are engaging in profiling without just cause.

If you are basing it on the neighborhood, you are engaging in profiling without just cause.

I hereby issue a challenge to you and anyone else who supports your asinine supposition, provide the basis for your comment.

Glory83
|
June 30, 2012
Thank you for this.
hypocrisyhater
|
June 30, 2012
dear mr or ms backinblack i happen to recognize some of the people opposing this home....and know as a matter of public record they are themselves convicted criminals who have needed "our" help in their lives such as the ones who need this home...the challenge then would be...check it out for yourself? their names are in this article...check out both sides of persons on this issue....it may not be as easy as it looks and oh yeah spewing your baseless comments to look all high & mighty looks completely assinine!!
Glory83
|
June 30, 2012
hypocrisyhater

Why don't you state which name in the article has a criminal record because I know three out of the four neighbors personally and I know for a fact that those three have a clean record. Which only leaves one more name. So your statement about "some" meaning plural neighbors in this article can not be true. Why don't you look into Pastor Tom Bardwell past and see what you find?
hypocrisyhater
|
June 30, 2012
dear esteemed glory83....i clearly stated to the challenge put forth by backinblack to check out the backgrounds of both sides....there are no winners here only losers....open your heart look real deep you'll find the answer!
debbdaves
|
June 29, 2012
! think it's funny that those who oppose this home may very well be convicted criminals themselves! Has anyone done a background check on them? "

Thank you for speaking the truth!
aztec
|
June 29, 2012
For anybody does not understand the situation, please READ the previous article that started it all...



http://tracypress.com/view/full_story/19071772/article-Coalition-sets-up-house-for-homeless?instance=news

hypocrisyhater
|
June 29, 2012
! think it's funny that those who oppose this home may very well be convicted criminals themselves! Has anyone done a background check on them? That is calling the kettle black!!!
mikaelasrose
|
June 29, 2012
Check the Megans Law website. Those are the people you should be concerned about.



We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.