School district budget relies on tax passage
by Denise Ellen Rizzo / Tracy Press
Jun 28, 2012 | 1820 views | 9 9 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Tracy Unified School District trustees are expected to approve a budget today, June 29, that is based on the premise that voters will pass Gov. Jerry Brown’s tax increase initiative in November.

The special meeting is scheduled for 4:10 p.m. in the district board room at 1875 W. Lowell Ave.

Casey Goodall, Tracy Unified’s assistant superintendent for business services, expects trustees to approve the 2012-13 spending plan.

“If the election supports the governor’s proposal, we will have the same level of funding next year as we had this year,” Goodall said. “Given this premise, Tracy Unified School District will receive no additional funding, will not be forced to make any budget reductions, but will still be spending more dollars than we receive. This ‘deficit spending’ can be sustained for greater than three years without additional budget reductions.”

Goodall said the district for years prepared for the worst and watched every dollar, making it possible to do more with less if state budget cuts should result in less money for kindergarten to 12th-grade education.

If the proposed taxes passed, Goodall estimates the area’s largest school district would see revenues decrease by about $4 million for the fiscal year beginning July 1, with revenues dropping from $116,429,711 in the 2011-12 fiscal year to $112,332,242 for 2012-13.

That creates a deficit of about $4.4 million for 2012-13, with expenditures estimated at $116,717,955.

But those totals only pencil out, Goodall said, if a majority of voters gives the OK to a Nov. 6 initiative that would provide more funding to public schools by providing funds to balance the state budget.

The initiative would generate about $9 billion annually by increasing the income tax by 3 percent on households earning more than $1 million dollars; by 2 percent on households earning $600,000 to $1,000,000; and by 1 percent on households earning $500,000 to $600,000. All of those increases are slated to expire after seven years.

The other aspect to the initiative would be an increase of the state sales tax by a quarter of a cent for four years.

“One major message I intend to share with the school board is that everything is absolutely dependent on the governor’s initiative,” Goodall said, “and that if his initiative fails, the impacts will be so dramatic, it will fundamentally change the way schools operate in California.”

Tracy Unified might be forced to make $7 million in reductions, but Goodall said it would take the remainder of the 2012-13 school year to identify cuts that would take effect at the beginning of 2013-14.

Members of the teaching profession are expected to push for the measure’s passage. Tracy Educators Association President John Anderson said the campaign was expected to kick into high gear in the fall.

“We need to educate the citizens, parents of Tracy, to vote in favor of it so the funds will be available for us to use — avoid the doomsday effect of it not passing,” Anderson said.

“I find it hard to believe the citizens of California and Tracy wouldn’t want to pass the initiative to save school funding, knowing the serious negative implications to children and the people of California.”

Goodall added that schools were already stretching scarce dollars, and he intended to drive that message home to trustees at the meeting.

“We are already operating with the lowest funding in decades,” Goodall said. “We are threatened with even greater reductions. And we are raising the bar on expectations. This is the key message for (today).”
Comments
(9)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
WestUSA
|
June 30, 2012
Education spending has been at its lowest in years-- while helping break generational poverty is the best investment a society can make. When class size increases, as it has at TUSD, then the result is that more classroom time is spent with behavior then learning. Kids nowdays are a product of the Me generation x'ers: they are spoiled with the need for video game-type action, and disrespect teachers and education in general.

Some posts on here demonstrate that same disrespect. You believe education perhaps should not be funded at all? Or if money is not spent correctly how many look at the public meetings and budget and actually offer specific examples?

Fact is, even if you don't have kids, we should all support the hope that education brings us: a child who matures into a productive member of society, versus one who drops out and adds to our incarceration rates. It begins here--what is it worth to you and your community to have good schools?
Sneaky
|
July 01, 2012
I am curious what you mean when you say that education spending is at the lowest point in years. Do you mean in terms of spending per pupil? Total funds spent on education? Percentage of general fund spent on education? Also, is whatever number you are using normalized to some sort of economic indicator such as the rate of inflation? Since the statement got me wondering I looked into what our spending has been and as either a total amount or as percentage of general fund it looks pretty flat (http://www.dof.ca.gov/budgeting/budget_faqs/documents/CHART-E.pdf) and is clearly not at its lowest point in years. For 2012/2013 education expenditures are shaping up to be higher than since 2007. Although we are near the bottom in per pupil spending (43rd when adjusted for cost of living according to http://toped.svefoundation.org/2012/01/13/ca-student-spending-near-bottom/) I was not able to find any indications that our per pupil spending is lower than "..it has been in years..". I also wonder if any of these are the correct metric. Ideally performance would be accounted for. For example something like per pupil spending (inf adj) over some student performance indicator.
Sneaky
|
July 01, 2012
A very enlightening article on CAs economic issues: http://reason.org/files/a2ec7caccc5d660e870c4a21526ef5f8.pdf

What is very clear from the graphs is that there is no shortage of spending going on.
princesaportuguese
|
June 29, 2012
90% of the school budget doesn't even go to the classrooms1 90%!!!!!! It goes to employee costs!!!!! I'm sick and tired of being asked at least once a week to bring in supplies to school when I pay property taxes AND the lottery pays a huge chunk to the state as well just to find out 90% goes to employee costs!! That's insane!!!!! I suggest watching an eye opening documentarty called The Cartel so you can see what's really going on with the schools and their budgets
amlee1978
|
June 29, 2012
I don't fully understand politics, but I do know Jerry Brown sucks and needs to be out of here. He made a lot of bad decisions for our state AGAIN, today...ugh
walkingtall
|
June 28, 2012
Here we go again going after us who are barely hanging on to our jobs and working for less than we used to and they just keep wanting more. Not a chance. You can throw as much money as you want at the schools and not only will nothing change, they will continue to want more. Mr Goodall needs to manage the district better. I can tell you first hand that I as a possible vendor of the district,I talked to an employee to try and get some business from them and save them money, and this employee told me that he didn't care about saving money because it's not his money. In so many words he said he has his buddies he buys from and that's that. Like most school districts, they clearly don't purchase properly to save their money, and as an outsider, if you are not one of there buddy vendors, you have no chance of getting there business. I say this truthfully as I deal with many school district, and some are better than others, but clearly, the Tracy Unified School District is mismanaged and not doing what they can to save money. School districts want more money when they clearly have enough if they would use it properly! A Big "No" vote for Me. I have given you enough Bond Money already!
Realintracy
|
June 28, 2012
Correction- may be right
Realintracy
|
June 28, 2012
"Simply morons"

No. They are exceptional morons and expect the people that pay their salaries....tax payers, are simple morons. Given the fact that we throw money at them, especially when they threaten or kids, and never demand accountablity, they mat just be right!
Sneaky
|
June 28, 2012
Why do politicians almost always assume that the amount of money coming in is going to increase? Are they simply morons or unable to learn from the past? It would be much wiser to assume that revenue will be at the lower end of any prjected range. Then if there is upside, great. If not, then you at least have a realistic plan.



We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.