Industrial development approved for northeastern Tracy
by Jon Mendelson / Tracy Press
May 04, 2012 | 2213 views | 5 5 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A large industrial development is taking shape in northeastern Tracy, though city and business officials haven’t disclosed what the project could be.

On Tuesday, May 1, the City Council voted unanimous to go-ahead for Prologis, one of the world’s largest developers of industrial real estate, to construct three new buildings totaling almost 1 million square feet south of Grant Line Road off Paradise Road in the Northeast Industrial Area.

The council vote also cleared the way for the nearby Barbosa Cabinet building to be expanded by 288,000 square feet.

Andrew Malik, the city’s development and engineering services director, said he didn’t know if Prologis had any particular company in mind for the spaces. He said sometimes developers get out in front of the market by getting approval for industrial construction before a tenant is lined up, a strategy helped by Tracy’s “flexible” industrial zoning criteria.

“You can lay out some buildings on parcels to maximize your footprint, and then respond to tenants once they’re ready to come in,” Malik said. “When (developers) make a decision … they need to jump now, and they typically need a really tight timeline.”

Prologis, contacted Wednesday, May 2, did not comment about possible tenants as of press time.

“Many times, they don’t want to be named,” Malik said regarding possible suitors for the space.

City Manager Leon Churchill said he did not see any specific link between the May 1 council action and a vote in December authorizing a tax incentive package for companies settling in Tracy that would create more than 1,000 full-time jobs and have taxable sales revenue of at least $100 million.

However, Churchill anticipated that some sort of big development would be announced in the next couple of months.

“These things typically close in the second quarter,” said Churchill, who was vague on details but said he remained “optimistic” about the city’s ability to land job producers.

“We still have to be patient.”



Also at Tuesday’s council meeting:

• By a 5-0 vote, the City Council made a move toward allowing larger signs on buildings with multiple tenants near the Interstate 205 corridor.

The issue gained the council’s attention when the Tracy Planning Commission had second thoughts about a sign raised by Staples — a sign that initially received the commission’s approval.

“The renderings (I was shown) didn’t match what I approved,” Charles Mann, chairman of the planning commission, told the council Tuesday.

The sign required a conditional use permit because it exceeded the square footage allowed for signs on businesses that share a single building. But it was placed on the building at 2471 Naglee Road before the City Council gave its thumbs up and a proper permit was issued.

Charlie Ingram, whose company built the sign and who traveled from South Carolina to defend it, apologized for moving forward without proper approval and attributed it to a communication mix-up.

“I was led to believe the (conditional use permit) would be a walk in the park,” she said, adding it might cost as much as $20,000 to remove the sign and ship it back to the East Coast. “I do apologize profusely for going without a permit.”

The council directed staff members to work with Staples to allow the sign to stay up in an effort to be business friendly. City employees will also draft an amendment allowing larger signs on buildings like the one Staples occupies.

But the council members also stressed that the vote should not betaken to mean they would allow end-runs around the city code.

“Rules apply equally to everyone,” said Councilman Robert Rickman.



• The council unanimously took a step toward building a biomass-fueled desalinization plant to help the city’s wastewater meet state standards.

The facility, near the old Holly Sugar plant north of Tracy, will burn nut shells and other biomass to drive a process that will take salts out of the treated wastewater the city discharges into the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

Steve Bayley, deputy director of the city’s public works department, said Tracy’s effluent does not meet state standards.



• A new memorandum of understanding

was unanimously approved between the Grand Foundation and the city to support the Grand Theatre Center for the Arts.

The Grand Foundation’s president, Mike Souza, also gave the city a $30,000 check — the fifth such check the nonprofit group has cut the city in five years in support of the downtown arts and education center.
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Davidbev
|
May 06, 2012
Perhaps the City would do the right thing this time and have the developer improve Grantline Rd to handle the truck traffic ... The road was great before the City annexed all the land and built all the distribution centers. They tore up the road to get water and sewage to this centers but never improved the road to handle the exponential increase in truck traffic. Now we have an extremely pot holed and bumpy road which requires regular travelers to get frequent front end alignments.... City of Tracy do the right thing like other cities do and require the developersimprove to improve the road FIRST!!!!!
returninghome
|
May 07, 2012
Grantline Road will always be a problem. It is a well known pipeline route for PGE.

CarpenterNewton
|
May 04, 2012
"...construct three new buildings totaling almost 1 million square feet south of Grant Line Road off Paradise Road in the Northeast Industrial Area."

I hope this isn't more warehouses. There is a huge complex of them just across the street from this site that has been there for years and has like one tenant.
newtotracy
|
May 05, 2012
totally agree with you CarpenterNewton! I'm not against growth...but building to "create jobs" through the mere act of building is but a bandaid. It actually creates a bigger issue if those buildings remain vacant...because now they are havens for criminal activity.

I keep wondering why we are building more strip malls, more industrial centers and more housing developments...when we have empty store fronts all over town, Macarthur is very open for anyone wanting it and there are vacant houses across town...old, new, big, small. Enough already, let's manage what we have instead of making the job harder!

Now...if indeed these ARE filled...great. But why couldn't the tenants use pre-existing structures would be my only question. Not that I don't think there isn't a valid reason...just curious since we DO have a lot of empty industrial looking space! :-)
returninghome
|
May 05, 2012
A company wanting to build that magnitude would do a lot more than just creating 1000 jobs. For one out of every 80 of us.

It would also help other businesses tremendously. And who knows, eventually some businesses might even move in to the empty ones. Good to see Barbosa expanding.

One of the so called empty buildings on the east side of our community is used for Brighter Christmas every year just before the holidays.



We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.