Your Voice: Can’t wait for health care reform
by Dr. M. Shahid Siddiqi, Tracy
Aug 04, 2009 | 1618 views | 16 16 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
EDITOR,

Health reform does not mean that 46 million Americans will be without health insurance — reform will keep the government out of your health care decisions, giving you the option to keep your coverage if you are happy with it.

For decades, politicians in Washington, D.C., have talked about fixing a broken health care system, and for decades Washington failed to act — allowing the special interests to stall reforms while the cracks in the system turned into crevasses, then craters.

Today, we are closer than ever to change we need — key committees in Congress have reached a striking degree of consensus about how to control costs, guarantee coverage, and provide more choices for every American.

While there are many ideas about how to best reform the health care system, most agree that all Americans should have affordable access to health care. Too many Americans are suffering under a health care system that does not work for them — Americans in minority communities have higher levels of disease, fewer medical options and worse outcomes.

Health care reform is not a luxury but a necessity. Health care reform is not only important for the health of all Americans but is also an economic imperative.

Christina Romer, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told lawmakers that health reform has real economic benefit.

Small business owners said that health care reform should be Washington’s top priority, as per a report on business published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

During this time of economic downturn, it is reasonable to ask if now is really the time to reform our health care system, as director of the federal Office of Management and Budget, Peter Orzag, explained that investing in health care reform now is not only imperative to ensuring the health of Americans, but that reform possesses deficit-reducing savings in the longer term.

Americans can not afford to wait any longer for health care reform.

Comments
(16)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
JoPlummer
|
August 11, 2009
It's the forcing out of the private that scares the bejeebers outta me. I don't know why they won't listen to the voters who probably wouldn't mind just to reform healthcare instead of overhauling it into a controlled, overextended, socialist, medicare system that pays for abortions. Trillion dollar deficit and no jobs. Yet our Career Congress can push a half-written bill through at Nancy's behest without even bothering to read it. I guess that's what happens when they have superior health care and we don't? No wonder citizens were upset when they were turned away at Town Hall meetings. They know more about the bill than the Congressmen.

Closing for business. Going bankrupt!

shelly13
|
August 10, 2009
We need a mix of the two. Do not get rid of private.
Ornley_Gumfudgen
|
August 06, 2009
Well ain't that interestin? Larned somethin though, larned which quack not ta go to ifin I be illin.

Know quite a few professional medical people, liberal an conservative alike, an this is th first who has thought the single payer plan bein foisted on th American Public as medical reform is a good idea.

Shoot, it might be a good idea.

But how are ya gonna know ifin they continue ta rush this 1,000 plus page reform through without lettin the rest of us look at it before it's passed into law?

What's wrong? Do ya think th average American citizen is to stupid to understand it? Perhaps they are, after all, look who they've elected ta represent them.

Want ta stop th problem with th high cost of medicine? Two words, "Tort reform."

That an havin the AMA bar bad doctors from practice instead of defendin em.
JimF01
|
August 06, 2009
The fact, mr head, is that Obama has stated since 2003 in multiple forums, that it will take time, but once the Dems take back the White House and the Congress (done), single payer health care will be the goal. That means making private health insurance illegal.

The agenda for those who support the public option plan now before the Congress is to call those of us who do not want government in charge of our health insurance a 'right-wing mob'. Look at the latest polls on Obama's approval and health care. This 'right-wing mob' is getting pretty large, there is a growing group of people opposed to spending $1Trillion of tax dollars we do not have to fund the plans before Congress.

That said, you continue on to bring up some needs which are entirely valid. This is what needs to be debated in Congress, keeping small business competitive, overall cost of health care, i.e. bang for the buck, $1500 for 5 stitches is out of line. Why do you suppose they are billing you that amount for that service? Hmm? Do you suppose, maybe, that you are subsidizing that safety net that I don't want my fellow man to have?
RadioHead
|
August 05, 2009
This story is dead on; the comments of some of the responders are not even close. If you’re going to fit against National Health Care do it with facts and logic. No, private insurance companies are not being forced out. One of the key statements is “if you have insurance that will not change”. The only agenda for the misinformation must be not wanting your follow man to have a safety net. That’s just wrong.

As a small business owner I have some very big needs, some of my views follow.

Small Business Needs

It may be hard to image in this time of recession that small businesses compete for the same worker talent as big business. In fact small business relies on highly talented personnel to compete in the world. Also not all small business are a Mom & Pop store, there are a huge number of high tech and business service industry small businesses. We need to be able to offer Health Insurance to our employees and morally we have to if we can.

Yes some small business may need to be exempt from being mandated to pay for there employees’ heath insurance but the workers need to have coverage.

For the small business that wants to pay for insurance, help make it as competitive as large businesses and unions. My wife’s successful (women Owned Small Business), pays for the health insurances for 2 families at $2200.00 a month, she needs help. The simple answer is a government mandated Small Business Risk Pool System, to lower costs. With this system small business will be joined with thousands of others to spread risk and lower cost to the point of being competitive. Everyone says how important Small Business is to the recovery from this recession and to fuel employment growth. Please help.

For the employees of a Small Business that is unable to pay for Health Insurance, allow them to enroll in the Small Business Risk Pool System for and enjoy the same rates for Health Insurance

Health Care Performance

It is well known that the US is paying 50% more in GNP than any major country in the world is for health care. At that 47 million Citizens’ are not covered. The results of that high cost are some of the lowest performance in the world. That includes high infant mortality, shorter life spans, and more major long-term illnesses due to the uninsured not being able to have well care.

The Need For Walk in Clinics

The High Cost of using Emergency Rooms as a Health Clinics was all too obvious to us went I when to the ER at Sutter Hospital in Tracy, California, several months ago. The cost for seeing a nurse for five minuets and a tech that gave me five stitches which took another 10 minutes was over $1500.00. I’m very luck my insurance paid most of that. At the same time I was waiting at least 7 people came in with flu symptoms and no insurance, the cost of all of those visits are paid by higher fees tacked onto the patients who could pay and the insurance companies.

Again the dollars saved by having walk in clinics that would care for minor illness, simple injuries, and some wellness care could save some of our trauma centers from closing.

The Uncounted Cost of Personal Bankruptcy’s

A majority of personal bankruptcies in this country are due to Catastrophic Medical Cost. The total cost to the private sector and government has to be included in the money saved by a National Health Care System.

JimF01
|
August 05, 2009
And there are proposed solutions on the table that do not require the government to be your insurance company and do not require taxpayers to foot the bill for health care for those who pay no taxes.

Maybe the solution is to break those local monopolies by allowing insurers to compete across state lines. That would bring federal anti-trust law to guarantee that no player build up a controlling interest in healthcare. That would force insurers to expand their networks. That would allow individual doctors and hospital to belong to hundred of networks and have access to more patients.
HD8
|
August 05, 2009
ordering a pizza in 2012?. . .

This is hilarious, but the scary part about it is that under obama it's not too far away from reality.

check the link below

http://aclu.org/pizza/images/screen.swf



MKoertje
|
August 05, 2009
Yes if i were part of an ins company i would certainly wish to keep the status quo..let them eat cake?????? Profits at 10 of the country’s largest publicly traded health insurance companies in 2007 rose 428 percent from 2000 to 2007, from $2.4 billion to $12.9 billion, according to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings. One of the major reasons, according to a new study, is the growing lack of competition in the private health insurance industry that has led to near monopoly conditions in many markets
JimF01
|
August 05, 2009
Anyone in tune with this issue knows full well that life expectancy numbers do not reflect quality of health care, your life expectancy is lower if you eat pizza, burgers and fries in the USA vs fish and rice in an asian country, for example.

Insurance companies are fighting for their very life, Obama's plan is to outlaw private insurance, at the outset the public option is unfair competition, the people creating the rules of the game are becoming a player.

That's not reform, that's a takeover.

If you want to know about abortion in Obamacare, you can read it from the AP here: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99SLQBG0&show_article=1

"free" healthcare will include plans that pay for abortions with your tax dollars

MKoertje
|
August 05, 2009
Private insurance companies are spending over $1M a day to kill the public option by inventing phony citizen groups, and trying to scare the elderly about euthanasia and pro-lifers with abortion; they know the only way to kill reform is to get people of good conscience fighting, while they laugh all the way to the bank. They don't think very highly of our intelligence.

We pay more than any other country to be 24th in life expectancy
JimF01
|
August 05, 2009
It is not hypocrisy for anyone to protest to keep the system they have or like, even if that is Medicare for the seniors you are referring to.

It is a false statement repeated by Obama to say that the Republican side of the aisle is only a party of no, or that no alternatives have been offered. Conservatives for Patients rights and heritage.org have a lot of information on this. http://www.heritage.org/LeadershipForAmerica/health-care.cfm

http://www.cprights.org/

It is Pelosi and Reid in the Congress who have made numerous parliamentary maneuvers to block amendments and proposals from the Republican side of the aisle.

When the only matter up for debate and vote is public option, Obama's path to single payer, then the answer is NO.
prdtracylib
|
August 05, 2009
A liberal/progressive viewpoint does not prevent one from being fair and balanced any more than a conservative viewpoint does.

Further, interesting how many people showing up on tv at town hall meetings railing against healthcare reform are seniors, the BIGGEST by far recipients of socialized medicine - total hypocracy, and morally corrupt!!

Our health care system is broken, and for all of the screaming conservatives out there shouting down even DISCUSSING reform - they have yet to offer any other alternative.
HD8
|
August 05, 2009
M. Shahid Siddiqi letter to the editor reefers to Christina Romer and Peter Orszag

Lets see how fair and balanced these two people are in my opinion.

Christina Romer was a economic adviser in the uhbama’s Presidential Campaign.

She is a professor at the very liberal University of California at Berkeley.

She has described herself as having “liberal Obama‘s heavy political views,”

Mr. Orszag embodies the administration’s awkward fiscal policy positioning: big spending now.

After Treasury Secretary timmy’s tax troubles and public speaking blunders, Mr. Orszag was one of several officials dispatched to the airwaves, where he presented the uhbama arguments.

Now Mr. Orszag has stocked the White House budget office with advisers who aspire to please uhbama. They include Cass Sunstein, a legal scholar close to uhbama; Jeffrey Liebman, a campaign adviser to uhbama, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a heath care expert who is Rahm Emanuel’s brother; and Kenneth Baer, a Clinton administration speechwriter.

I am sure neither of these people have a horse in this race.

Now what did the Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf have to say about uhbana’s socialized health care.

Director Elmendorf warned lawmakers that the legislation that he has seen would raise costs, not lower them.

"In the legislation that has been reported, we do not see the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending by a significant amount," he said. "And on the contrary, the legislation significantly expands the federal responsibility for health care costs."

After these remarks Director Elmendorf was called into uhbama’s office and I am sure it wasn’t for a BEER.

JimF01
|
August 05, 2009
This says it all about Orzag's claims

http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/08/the_cbo_might_be_wrong_but_orszag_isnt_right.php

You don't want these medical decisions becoming political issues
JimF01
|
August 04, 2009
Americans can not afford to wait any longer for health care reform.

There, fixed that for you


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.