Second test at gun shop shows no airborne asbestos
by Denise Ellen Rizzo
Aug 31, 2012 | 4359 views | 4 4 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A second environmental test for asbestos at the former 11th Street gun shop has proven to be negative for airborne asbestos, according to city officials.

At the request of building owner George Papadakis, a test was conducted by Oakdale-based Bovee Environmental Management, Inc. on Aug. 14 at 22 East 11th St. The test report states the areas examined for airborne asbestos were the building’s flooring, ceiling and various walls.

In areas chosen by the owner, air samples were taken for an hour in the front and back of the building, according to the Bovee report. Those samples were then tested using a process called transmission electron microscopy that counts asbestos airborne fibers collected from the clearance samples to determine a representative asbestos fiber concentration level of the regulated area.

Bovee officials ruled in their report that no asbestos structures were detected, and the building could be reoccupied.

The testing came in wake of the former tenant of the building, Rick Hedrick of Tracy Shooting Supplies informing city officials that he was told the building had airborne asbestos.

Hedrick said he hired Sierra Environmental Testing and Consulting, Inc. of Woodbridge to test the building on June 8 and their tests came back positive for asbestos inside the building. The report stated the company collected three samples of building materials and found asbestos in the wallboard/joint taping compound and ceiling tile texture.

Hedrick said he became suspicious after he developed breathing problems and closed his shop in mid-June. He said he thought the problem might have been related to a roof leak from 2002, and he said inspectors told him there was airborne asbestos in the building.

City officials were notified of the alleged hazard by Hedrick, and Tracy Code Enforcement Manager Ana Contreras said they had considered a vacate order for the building in early August. She said that changed after she talked to testing officials at Sierra who informed her that they never tested for airborne asbestos.

Contreras said on Thursday, Aug. 30, that the reports by Bovee and Sierra speak for themselves and the city has closed their investigation into the matter.

“No further action will be taken on the part of the city,” she said. “However we have established internal control in the event the property owners remodel or do construction within the building that may prompt an asbestos concern.”

Contreras said the building’s owners will have to notify the city with the normal permitting process prior to construction. If they do apply for city permits, she said they will also have to undergo the permit process by the San Joaquin County Air Pollution Control District to address any disposal requirements of materials with asbestos content.

Hedrick said he had no comment regarding the latest testing conducted on his former rental space.

After numerous attempts for an interview, the property owners’ son Nathaniel Papadakis stated in an e-mail to the Tracy Press on Aug. 29 that the family is declining to comment at this time.

Contact Denise E. Rizzo at 830-4225 or drizzo@tracypress.com

Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
dc7drvr
|
September 02, 2012
Not really a problem if you read the articles. The owner developed breathing problems that he attributed to the building. He had the building tested, but they tested only the wallboard, joint taping compound, and ceiling texture. They found asbestos in those areas, but did not test for airborne asbestos. The store owner closes his store out of concern for safety thinking that the asbestos in the building represents a hazzard.

Under the direction of the City, the owner orders an airborne test and it comes up negative. The city now says the building can be occupied unless remodeling is done that will disturb the asbestos in the wallboard and texture.

This is not uncommon, because asbestos in the building materials do not represent a hazard unless they become airborne due to construction.

dc7drvr
|
September 02, 2012
Not really a problem if you read the articles. The owner developed breathing problems that he attributed to the building. He had the building tested, but they tested only the wallboard, joint taping compound, and ceiling texture. They found asbestos in those areas, but did not test for airborne asbestos. The store owner closes his store out of concern for safety thinking that the asbestos in the building represents a hazzard.

Under the direction of the City, the owner orders an airborne test and it comes up negative. The city now says the building can be occupied unless remodeling is done that will disturb the asbestos in the wallboard and texture.

This is not uncommon, because asbestos in the building materials do not represent a hazard unless they become airborne due to construction.

LuckyInTracyNot
|
September 01, 2012
Contreras said the building’s owners will have to notify the city with the normal permitting process prior to construction. If they do apply for city permits, she said they will also have to undergo the permit process by the San Joaquin County Air Pollution Control District to address any disposal requirements of materials with asbestos content.

This looks like a mexican stand off folks. One asbestos company voids the other ones claim but if the building owner wants to remodel he will be subject to a county asbestos test. Let me see here, if the county say's there is asbestos the former tenant has a case. If asbestos isn't detected he has no case and it's back to work time.

ChrisRoberts
|
August 31, 2012
So what did we learn here folks?

When one test is positive for cancer-causing asbestos and the owner closes his store?

Well hire some redneck's out of Oakdale to test the building and tell you it's okay.

Never mind the previous owner's breathing problem, which very well might develop into something far worse.

Thanks TracyPress for keeping the citizens INFORMED. I would never dream of shopping at that ramshackle anyways, it looks like the building is going to fall apart as it is!


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.