Lewis, who served on the TUSD board from 1998 and 2010, was selected by a 4-2 vote during a special meeting at the District Education Center. He will be officially appointed to the seat at the school board’s next regular meeting on Jan. 8.
The 49-year-old said he was happy to get another opportunity to serve and noted that his immediate goal it to “get caught up, learn and help.”
Lewis said he left the board because his children had graduated the local schools and he was looking for other things to do to contribute to the community.
The other applicants were Marvin Barth, Mitra Behnam, Wes-Thomas Huffman, Lewis, Ann Mooney, Jass Sangha and Gurgit Srai.
Voting for Lewis were trustees Greg Silva, Jill Costa, Greg Crandall and James Vaughn, while Ted Guzman voted for Mooney and Walter Gouveia voted for Sangha.
Silva said his vote for Lewis was based upon his previous experience, proven leadership and the fact that he was relatively current with board issues as a member of the district’s Measure S oversight committee, which oversees spending on the $41 million bond passed by voters to modernize schools in 2008.
“I really like the fact that he has been on the board fairly recently and he is really up-to-speed in a fairly short time on issues the board is facing now and will be facing in the next two years,” Silva said.
Since the appointment required a four-fifths vote, Lewis was appointed to the position without a second vote by the board. He will serve the remaining two years of Swenson’s four-year-term.
Swenson resigned Dec. 13 after 18 years as a board trustee. He cited more time with family as his main reason for leaving his post.
Candidates were given 10 minutes to answer two questions:
n Why do you want to be on the school board?
n What role does a board member play in the governance of the school district?
Candidates were brought into the school board meeting room one at a time and in alphabetical order to answer the questions in front of the trustees.
The interviews were open to the public.
During questioning, all of the candidates spoke about their qualifications to serve on the school board, including their educational backgrounds and experience. Most said the appointment would provide them with the opportunity to give back.
Barth, who holds five college degrees, said serving on the board would provide him a “sense of satisfaction.”
A question of diversity was raised by Behnam, who said the board needed diversity to match the changing face of the school district, and Mooney said she wanted to assure that all children have access to an excellent education.
Huffman, Srai and Sangha spoke about their passion and desire to make a difference in the community.
Lewis talked about his prior experience on the Tracy Unified board and his desire to help the community.
When it came to discussing the board’s role, the answers from the candidates were more diverse.
“The school board’s job is to see a much bigger picture and facilitate those that do the work,” Huffman said.
Sangha believes that the board is the policymaker for the superintendent and staff.
Lewis said he believed the board’s role was to hire the superintendent and set the standards for the district. He said trustees need to make policies that are reasonable and attainable.
At the conclusion of the interviews and appointment, a number of the trustees urged the unsuccessful candidates to remain active in the school district and apply for the board again in the future.
“It’s great we as a community have people like you to come out,” Silva said. “Please continue your involvement.”
The names of the applicants were provided to the Tracy Press by TUSD officials on Monday, Dec. 31, after a public information request was filed with the school district.
• Contact Denise Ellen Rizzo at 830-4225 or drizzo@tracypress.com.
At a glance
WHAT: Tracy Unified School District
WHEN: 7 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 3
WHERE: District Education Center board room, 1875 W. Lowell Ave.
DETAILS: President Greg Silva and trustees Jill Costa, Greg Crandall, Walter Gouveia, Ted Guzman and James Vaughn were present.



There is a difference between responsible speech and jejune speech.
I endeavor to use the best word(s) to express my sentiment. If I thought any of the words you cited was suitable in describing my feelings in regard to the adolescent attitude infused in the language used by some of the readers of this paper with their comments, I would have used one of them, but none of the words you listed expressed my sentiment.
Now, what are you insinuating about me with the comment “to elevate the perception of your superiority”?
A few thoughts: Should we remove the word superiority from our lexicon? May we recognize the superiority of one person over another in regard to a specific capacity? Or is a doctor a doctor a doctor a doctor? That is, are we permitted to evaluate and differentiate the talents of each? Also, should we deem any person’s perception of himself as being superior to another in some capacity as an act of gauche hubris?
I don’t assail your karma (or integrity). I am simply asking a few questions.
Anyway, using my first amendment right of free speech, I hope all of us while we may disagree on issues can come away with better informed knowledge from learning from the other side and perhaps have a better understanding of each other since how we vote on which side depend our own personal experiences in life that’s different from those we oppose or disagree with.
Unfortunately it's a sad fact that when a person enterin a debate cannot support his or her arguement with provable facts that person more times than not will twist th topic bein debaited inta a personal attack at his or her debatin opponent in an effort ta discredit his or her opponent an thus win the argument of debate. Don't worry, only th weak of mind can't preceive what is actually happening. In educated circles of society they understand when this happens an respond accordinagly with thair support either through thair contribution ta th arguement or, more importantly, thair support an consarn regarding th government entity being discussed in th debate.
I'll give ya credit fer tryin but with those three yer wastin yer time. Still, others see what's goin on so thair's a sort of a win thair even if ya aren't immediately aware of it.
(TOTALLY AWESOME)!
Since the Pledge of Allegiance
And
The Lord's Prayer
Are not allowed in most
Public schools anymore
Because the word 'God' is mentioned....
A kid in Arizona wrote the attached
NEW School prayer:
"New Pledge of Allegiance"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now I sit me down in school
Where praying is against the rule
For this great nation under God
Finds mention of Him very odd.
If scripture now the class recites,
It violates the Bill of Rights.
And anytime my head I bow
Becomes a Federal matter now.
Our hair can be purple, orange or green,
That's no offense; it's a freedom scene..
The law is specific, the law is precise.
Prayers spoken aloud are a serious vice.
For praying in a public hall
Might offend someone with no faith at all..
In silence alone we must meditate,
God's name is prohibited by the state.
We're allowed to cuss and dress like freaks,
And pierce our noses, tongues and cheeks...
They've outlawed guns, but FIRST the Bible.
To quote the Good Book makes me liable.
We can elect a pregnant Senior Queen,
And the 'unwed daddy,' our Senior King.
It's 'inappropriate'
We're taught that such 'judgments' do not belong..
We can get our condoms and birth controls,
Study witchcraft, vampires and totem poles..
But the Ten Commandments are not allowed,
No word of God must reach this crowd.
It's scary here I must confess,
When chaos reigns the school's a mess.
So, Lord, this silent plea I make:
Should I be shot; My soul please take!
Amen
By now you should know I have no problem "Slandering" anyone. I have done it to the mayor, city council members, Dale Cose, Corrupt members of our "police department", etc, etc.
I have even given my address, multiple times for anyone who has a problem with what I say. Knock on the door and step up.
But you wont do that, will you? Old man? What you scared of? Me and my Vietnam vet father? Oh yea, you should be!
"doorsc,
Tracy is racist. So it's no surprise the the major employers here still are. They keep old folks in there as long as they can to keep tradition alive. I would encourage you to do your own thing and grow big but those old timers will just shoot it down if it isn't quit white enough. Good luck in 2013 anyhow."
So where is the outrage by BIB and dcose and other right wingers over this comment?
I can't help but join DD in saying they have a vendetta against liberal women on this site.
It seems you cannot accept the fact others are also getting tired of your hate mongering, derogatory, and oft times libelous comments which almost always break the Tracy Press rules posted below. They also seem to be getting tired of the Tracy Press staff doing absolutley nothing to enforce their rules to make this a more civil discussion board.
With very comment you continue to prove my point about your hate mongering and worthless comments.
I do think debdaves' comment about the decision is another baseless again and biased comment as is her custom. But no surprises there. And ChrisRoberts I did not expect any differently either.
No substance. I am just glad to see people ask debdaves to show support for her position because in doing so the readers have the opportunity to ascertain that debdaves and ChrisRoberts and doorsc are making moot points and backing it up with no points at all.
I will give you an example of a libelous comment, for the record libel applies to the written word, slander is for the spoken word.
dcose is a person who uses his actual name, he is a known entity. When you call him a rascist which you've done, you damn well better be able to prove it. Otherwise, you have committed libel. If Dale could prove your claim was baseless and caused him some sort of damage, you would have a big problem sister. To wit:
li·bel
[ lb'l ]
1.defamation: a false and malicious published statement that damages somebody's reputation.
2.attacking of somebody's reputation: the making of false and damaging statements about somebody
Again, the facts are on my side. Welcome to the world of the enlightened.
CR, doorsc, and debbdaves, ready to debate the First Amendment? My challenge still stands.
I'm pretty sure neither doorsc or CR will step up to the plate either. Seems to me the only people who's nerves I'm getting on are the ones who have a terribly wayward interpretation of the First Amendment. They are also the people who are the perpetraitors of the kind of hate mongering, derogatory & oft times libelous comments the cowards at the Tracy Press should ban. Gee, seems no different than people who break the law then complaining about getting a ticket or being arrested, yea, it's the fault of those dastardly police.
By the way, your blinders must be a little tight as there are quite a few comments supporting my challenge to the gutless wonders at the TP to clean up this websites comment section which has become a pathetic example of the regression of our society.
Your turn.
You seem, I repeat seem to be of the same mentality as debbdaves. Tell you what, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and try debating you to see how it goes.
debbdaves and apparently you seem to believe the First Amendment has no limitations. Fine. I maintain the First Amendment has limitations. To back up my belief I present you with the fact we have libel & slander law so that in itself proves I'm right and you in addition to debbdaves are wrong.
Your turn.
"Thank you for your kind concern, BIB, disguised. Yes this country needs help. It needs to get away from the Republican agenda. Remember the christians who used to burn witches for being witches? I bet you hate homosexuals too, and Romney's binders full to women. Anyone who is pro choice, or liberal, is seen as needing godly intervention by the likes of holy men. I think the world would be a better place without these holy men. They need help. Why don't you go shoot some pigeons or something or sleep with your first cousin and make another baby, to feel better? Welcome to Tracy."
Read more: Tracy Press - His Voice Congress must pass reasonable gun control
For the last time, you cannot say whatever you want about whoever you want, that is a fact.
Get it?
Now go fill up your pick up truck with 4.00 gas and be quiet.