His Voice: Make bailouts a two-way street
by Larry Hite
Nov 07, 2009 | 764 views | 36 36 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I’m trying to figure out when the world went mad.

I can’t figure out when we all agreed to pay out huge sums of money to “bail out” banks so they wouldn’t go bankrupt. These are the institutions that allowed consumers and sometimes enticed them into loans that they had no business obtaining, leading to widespread foreclosures and bankruptcy across America.

These are also the institutions that have raised interest rates on credit cards to 29 percent (a record high) on folks who have been late on a couple of payments throughout the year. This is the banks’ way of penalizing you for having financial problems.

Doesn’t it seem ironic that the institutions that are penalizing their customers for having financial hardship have asked for bailout money to cover their financial hardships from the very taxpayers they are penalizing? The difference here is that the banks are being granted the money from the government — at your and my expense — by lawmakers who have not asked us how we feel about it.

I don’t really think that lawmakers should have to ask us how we feel about bailing the banks out — it should go without saying. I would hope that they can see clearly who is footing the bill for this and who is getting shafted on a daily basis.

If lawmakers had taken all the bailout money and distributed it to American taxpayers equally, hopefully most would have paid off mortgages, credit debt and so on. That not only helps consumers get out of debt, but also gives the public more spending power, which would stimulate our flat economy. It would also relieve the banks’ financial situations by recovering money from outstanding loans and credit.

Granted, not all taxpayers would pay off their bills, but I would imagine most would.

The crux of this is we, as American taxpayers, are the ones major industries and banking institutions turn to when they are faced with financial woes. They turn to us by asking our elected officials to grant them our money in forms of stimulus and bailout funds, and they receive it without the approval of the taxpayers, the ones funding the bailouts.

Granted, in the scope of the world economy, it is not good for a country’s banks to go under because of the holdings and investments they have abroad. However, it doesn’t make much sense for the very people who are coming to the aid of financial institutions to have their interest rates raised and to lose their homes as thanks for keeping financial institutions out of bankruptcy and saving their bacon.

Doesn’t it seem like the wrong people are reaping the rewards for the financial situation that this country is in? Doesn’t it seem like forgiveness is a one-way street when it comes to the financial woes of the American taxpayer and financial institutions?

The public needs to send a message to elected officials and banking institutions that enough is enough. Americans who are fed up with friends, neighbors and family members being displaced from their homes or financially ruined by rising interest rates on credit accounts need to tell their elected officials in Washington, D.C., that they want lawmakers to make bailouts a two-way street.

Banks should not be able to receive bailout money until they demonstrate that they are doing their part to reduce the overall debt and interest rates for all customers and to establish programs that will prevent Americans from losing their homes.

If the banks want the American public to work with them, they need to work with the American public.

The banks are not listening to their customers, so maybe they will listen if lawmakers step up and represent the public that they serve and stop just giving the store away. We need to insist that our elected officials put a stop to people being foreclosed on and forced into bankruptcy by banks and lending institutions and rather force them to work with the American public to resolve the financial situation in this country.

• Larry Hite is a Tracy resident and owner of Tracy Home Inspections. He is past president of Tracy Rotary, active in Habitat for Humanity, chairman of Tracy Entrepreneurs and co-founder of Central Valley Business Alliance.

comments (36)
« FrostySnowball wrote on Sunday, Nov 15 at 06:07 PM »
bailouts,

Your comment about the banks paying it back would make sense, but Im not aware that TimG structured it that way? I doubt they will pay anythign back. When they gave the banks money to give it to foreign bank executives in million dollar bonuses, it left the country. I doubt we'll ever see a dime back from those foreign bank executives and you might alos ask since they're not even paying American taxes on those million dollar bonuses? That was a great question!
« FrostySnowball wrote on Sunday, Nov 15 at 06:01 PM »
Tom,

It's never "too late" for dialog. The unempleyment rate in Tracy, CA happens to be lower than the USA national average. So, I'm not sure if you're saying you could do better than what was already done? If you think so, then I'll be listening, but if you want' to fix something why don't you run for President? I'm sure there will be someone else in-line before you and me for County Supervisor? Don't you agree?
« TomBenigno wrote on Sunday, Nov 15 at 04:52 PM »
Spaceballs:

It's too late to talk about it now. His term will end in 2012,and that will be three terms.

« FrostySnowball wrote on Sunday, Nov 15 at 02:30 PM »
Tom, I think we already know the economy's in the crapper. That's the reasoning behind the letter.

Maybe you want to tell us why should we should have selected Tom Benigno over Ornellas?

Otherwise, I'll just wait for the movie.

I'm reading the words "Pompass ### arogance" and thinking, "Save us the drama?"

I've seen better actors on the BBC.
« TomBenigno wrote on Sunday, Nov 15 at 10:58 AM »
Snowballs:

I glad I didn't get elected, because they would be blaming me for all the screw ups that have been going on.

Ornellas has to or more years to really mess it more than it is right now. Bedford was another victim of the Ornellas era. I hope you become a victim of his Pompas ### ignorance. Just wait more is coming.
« FrostySnowball wrote on Saturday, Nov 14 at 08:58 PM »
Ornley,

Yep, I thought the same thing when I read that one. And if I had to guess I'd would say it's another bid for the County Supervisor, for a second straight defeat in a row?
« TomBenigno wrote on Friday, Nov 13 at 02:39 PM »
Ornely:

I think the "Dog Catcher"makes the same money as the Mayor of Tracy. Plus I'll get a truck.
« Ornley_Gumfudgen wrote on Friday, Nov 13 at 10:20 AM »
Kinda looks like ole Tom's gonna hit th ole political campaign trail once again. So, what else is new? Wonder what position it will be this time around?

Don't thank we elect Dog Catcher do we? :) Relax Tom, don't get yer knickers in a wad over this, it's just a joke.
« Green_Acres wrote on Wednesday, Nov 11 at 08:12 PM »
Tom,

Try contacting Milton Bradley.
« TomBenigno wrote on Wednesday, Nov 11 at 09:10 AM »
MarleyNhim:

I must have hit a nerve, so much interest in a simple service to home sellers or buyers.

Could this be more than service or is it a monopoly? Who going to inspect the inspectors?
« MarleyNMe wrote on Tuesday, Nov 10 at 09:00 PM »


TomBenigno wrote on Monday, Nov 09 at 08:30 AM »

Get off the issue about your friend L Hite, he is hired to inspect a home. Who do you think pays for that service? The new owner and the banks.

"


Tom,

The bank does not pay. In fact most banks are not budging. They aren't paying anything. At the same time they are raising interest. That's why things are slow right now. And that was the point of the article. The author is probably not making money off the banks. The homeowner pays for the inspection and when they can't get a loan because the bank wont budge you clearly have BAD banks who were interested in making a business out of loans.

The problem with banks is that their stubbornness is harming our economy. And people think they don't care.

Now, this business of blaming the inspectors just doesn't add up and besides that, I think you completely missed the point of the letter.

« TomBenigno wrote on Tuesday, Nov 10 at 04:57 PM »
Anonymous:

I have been on this blog for about 5 years and you keep coming back to attacking someone, rather than be on the target of the subject.

I think the subject was the bailout a two way street. Let's keep your negative comments to your self, and get back to the subject at hand.

Thanks Sigmund you Wack-O.

« RedHotChilliPeppers wrote on Monday, Nov 09 at 05:37 PM »
Tom,

The bank only pays the inspector if you negotiate with them for it. When you're payin several hundred thousand dollars a hundred dollars isn't worth haggling about. Ask the bank for a new rug.
« TomBenigno wrote on Monday, Nov 09 at 05:22 PM »
Unconcerned Bad dude:

I have no axe to grind, I just want justice for those who have been harmed by you liberals and your warm and fuzzy feelings.

I think you know what I'm talking about. Have you ever met or talked to me in person, I doubt it. Until you can really understand what is happening in our Town and State and Country,I am speaking out for those who may not feel comfortable doing so.

I hope your comments aren't a warning,to me about my time around here and another forum. You sound like a terrorist. I think I made myself very clear.
« badattitude49 wrote on Monday, Nov 09 at 02:14 PM »
I'm sorry Tom but the longer you are around here the less sense you make. You obviously have an axe to grind with many folks around here but you need to take it to another forum. Try some of that Ripple you spoke of earlier. It might calm your anger just a bit.
« TomBenigno wrote on Monday, Nov 09 at 08:30 AM »
MarleyNme:

Get off the issue about your friend L Hite, he is hired to inspect a home. Who do you think pays for that service? The new owner and the banks.

Stop being a pain in the $$$ you know what I mean. Of course the inspector doesn't make the loans.

Get on the right thinking.

« MarleyNMe wrote on Monday, Nov 09 at 12:37 AM »
Tom,

I agree with you that banks made the loans. However, that doesn't mean that Inspectors made loans. Once again, you are scratching the surface. As a homeowner I paid the Inspector. I did not pay the bank the Inspection fee.

Try to pay attention. The bank did NOT pay the Inspector. I did and I contacted the Inspector myself. I made sure to be there at the same time as the inspector, because the Inspector was working for me.

If there is anything wrong with the home it gets written down. Even the things I pointed out and made sure were on the inspector's list. That's why told you the inspector's work for me. Not the bank. That's not an insult, Tom. That's an observation based on experience.