Council asked to ax 69-full-time jobs, services
by Eric Firpo
Oct 30, 2009 | 2157 views | 46 46 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Tracy's City Council next Tuesday will be asked to ax 69 full-time jobs from the city’s payroll, privatize some services, cut activities for kids and seniors, reduce hours, consolidate work and take others actions as it looks to slash $6.2 million from its budget and close a $9 million deficit.

Dozens of employees starting Monday were told they would be out of jobs, and though administrators are still talking with unions to try to find a way to save a job or two, much of the council's painful task is laid out in detail in a report made public Thursday afternoon.

But because some of the jobs that are expected to cut are vacant, and because some employees have chosen to retire, the actually number of people the council could lay off is 39.

No department is unaffected, and employees are expected to receive lay-off notices starting at the first of the year.

In the police department, the equivalent of 20 full-time jobs will be cut as the department is reorganized and shrunk. The council will be asked to lay off four officers, and disband its gang unit, who will be moved to patrol, where they'll “focus on gang intelligence,” according to a report for the council.

At the animal shelter, a “significant reduction” of service could take place as officers split time between the shelter and fieldwork, while the records department is expected to become smaller and officers take on duties of other non-sworn employees.

Deputy chief Rick Golphin will be out of a job, and captains will be demoted to lieutenants, who will report directly to Chief Janet Thiessen.

In the fire department, the council will be asked to ax about seven full-time jobs to 76 from 83 positions, though no uniformed firefighters will be let go. The plan there is to have building inspectors also do fire inspections and cut the job of fire marshal, cut one vacant firefighter's job, and try to pare down overtime — a big reason roughly 75 percent of department employees earned more than $100,000 in fiscal year 2008-09.

A fire captain's job will be cut “through attrition,” a euphemism for retirement, and the duties split among other fire department managers.

In the parks department, four full-time employees are expected to be laid off, while hours for the senior center are recommended to be cut one hour per day, preschool activities might be privatized, and the Joe Wilson Pool at Dr. Powers Park will be closed next July and moved to West High School until 2011. The after-school activities a Hirsch Elementary School are expected to be shut down.

In the engineering department, five full-time jobs will be cut, including two building inspectors and the task outsourced when the load of building permits gets too heavy for the department.

The public works department, where many employees are Teamsters, is slated to lose 16 full-time jobs, including a couple of senior maintenance workers due to the privatization of the work of trimming city trees.

Matt Robinson, the city spokesman, will be out of a job if the council follows through on the recommendations, and the economic development department could handle marketing city events, while each department might have its own spokesperson.

And the job of the head of the Grand Theatre of the Arts, now occupied by Theresa Yvonne, who said she's leaving the city for a similar job in Lancaster, Calif., will be cut. City administrators suggest the council combine three art galleries at the Grand into a co-op run perhaps by local artists, and the booking of shows at the Grand could be outsourced to a private company.

Several secretaries in city departments could be let go, and the city's computer manager is expected to be laid off.

And while the layoff will get the city much of the way toward closing its deficit, it must also take other measures and has started a move to bring a ballot measure to voters to ask they OK a parcel tax to help pay for police and firefighters' salaries.

The city hopes to get its revenues in line with expenses by the 2012-13 fiscal year, and until then it will continue to use reserves to close the budget gap, and likely ask for concessions from city labor groups.

Contact Tracy Press City Editor Eric Firpo at 830-4223 or efirpo@tracypress.com.

comments (46)
« MarleyNMe wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 11:50 PM »
Privatizing the Grand is the only thing that could save it. Downtown businesses don't recognize the potential of having the Grand. For example, during the Bean Festival how many paying customers visited the Grand Theatre? In fact, they handed out flyers at cost. The fact is the Grand generated less revenue during the Bean Festival than they brought in. That model needs to change. And only a privatized model would have lateral ability to change that.
« liro89 wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 11:33 PM »
WOW! make the grand theatre into a private organization...are they out of their mind??...think of all the children who are going to be out of cultural art classes and the good things it has done to our community...I say save the grand theatre and let all the other jobs which just sit at their desk go!
« RedHotChilliPeppers wrote on Wednesday, Nov 04 at 10:04 AM »
Actually I have observed some of the volunteers and how they operate you can watch them on channel 26 and afterward in the foyer of city hall. Special interest groups. There are not enough of them. And if there were I wouldn't want my city paying for these special inyerest groups.
« StandUp! wrote on Wednesday, Nov 04 at 09:43 AM »
Redhotchilipepper, you need to do your homework on what some of the grant money's are going to and how some of these programs ran prior to the city taking over. A lack of volunteers is not the problem, the problem is the city throwing money at programs that can be and have been handled by volunteers. Look into it, you will see.
« RedHotChilliPeppers wrote on Tuesday, Nov 03 at 06:06 PM »
What volunteers? When the economy peoples genorisity dries up. Both their money and their time.
« Stand up! wrote on Tuesday, Nov 03 at 05:25 PM »
The city manager is out to protect his self and his over paid staff. If you don't believe me, look at what his department does. There are grant proposals that pay for what volunteers have always done in the city. Tax dollars can be better spent on such things as police and fire. it is really an outrage and if more people were aware, there would be a run at city hall.
« anonymous wrote on Tuesday, Nov 03 at 03:10 PM »
Well I would encourage each and everyone of you to attend City Council this evening and let your voice be heard. This is your community, your money, and your safety that they are deciding on this evening. We need to make sure that not only Council but the City Manager and the Chief of Police are aware of this community's dislike of how they are proposing to run our City
« pressure wrote on Tuesday, Nov 03 at 02:31 PM »
This is what I think, I think the new Chief walked into series problem that seemed to happen in rapid succession, CNN sure did a fine job of reporting on Tracy...it is a wonder she didn't resign under pressure! No one thinks she needs more time?

Too soon to disband the unit? I think so.

CN

« anonymous wrote on Tuesday, Nov 03 at 02:22 PM »
Also I noticed in reading the article why do they not mention the captain's name who is being demoted? They make it a point to mention the Deputy Chief's name but not the captain. Is the Chief trying to eliminate her competition? Is she trying to remove the 2 people who applied and tested for the Chief's position?
« RedHotChilliPeppers wrote on Tuesday, Nov 03 at 12:44 PM »
Which one? Did you have somebody in mind?

and did that person you had in mind put their hand up. I haven't heard.
« anonymous wrote on Tuesday, Nov 03 at 12:18 PM »
Just too bad they didn't promote one of the officers to be the Chief, they know the town like the back of their hands, they know the demography. Maybe they do their thinking OUTSIDE of the triangle?
« fabulous209 wrote on Tuesday, Nov 03 at 12:11 PM »
It is truly unbelievable that it appears that this Chief is starting the same process as she did when she was in Kansas. And this same process got her a no confidence vote and asked by the city manager and council to leave. Does she truly know what the needs of this community are. Prior to her reign of terror the police department seemed to be running this smoothly. In fact they did an excellent job handling the Cantu case and other high profile events. I believe council really needs to look closely at what this chief's past record was and what she is doing now before it is to late. If she is allowed to continue it is not her that will feel her mistakes but the citizens of our community.
« MarleyNMe wrote on Monday, Nov 02 at 10:06 PM »
noserious,

What sources? I never heard that before.
« mommieoftwo wrote on Sunday, Nov 01 at 05:47 PM »
Wow! A vote of no confidence huh? I knew I was getting that "red flag" feeling regarding this chief. She is not in Kansas anymore Dorothy, time to think and act like a Californian. WE HAVE GANGS. Keep the gang unit!! Not too bright is she? So if her other department did not have faith in her then why would we want her? Also, I know it is maybe a coincidence, but there sure has been a lot of crime and shootings and the Cantu case she came on board....I would like to know and I think we have a right as citizens of Tracy to know how she came about to be hired? All cops have a background check, so who did hers and what were the results of the reason for no confidence? I am sure we can call her old PD and find someone to talk to that would give us the truth? And we need to find out who was (ir)responsible in hiring her because obviously that person is not a good decision maker either and should be fired!! I looked up articles from her old town and months before she came to Tracy she resigned! Makes sense if her department had NO CONFIDENCE in her!! We will be wanting her to resign from here too with these bad decisions for the department which directly affects our community!
« no..seriously wrote on Sunday, Nov 01 at 05:18 PM »
It is my understanding that the Chief of Police resigned from her Kansas post because she was facing a "No Confidence" vote from their union members. If this is true, then it is amazing that after a "nationwide" police chief search, that was the best candidate the City could find? Tracy Press might want to look into this and find out if it is true. Sources inside the police department say that it is!
« anonymous wrote on Sunday, Nov 01 at 10:16 AM »
The real savings is reduce from the top down, not bottom up. Take the dead wood from the top!
« Saywhat? wrote on Sunday, Nov 01 at 09:07 AM »
So no outrage for my previous post? Maybe if the city of Tracy used a strong mayor format then there would be no need for a city manager at $200,000 per year plus housing credits, (I suppose when you make such a little salary, you can't afford housing???)a city car, benefits etc. Oh and lets not forget the assistant at more then $150,000 per year, because after all, we can't work Mr Churchill too much! Is mayor Ives full time employment costing the city hundreds of thousands of dollars? Take back your city Mr Ives after all we voted you in not the city manager, Get rid of the waste we call Leon Churchill and his staff!
« IndianaJones wrote on Sunday, Nov 01 at 08:34 AM »
Actually, the State is helping the TP prosecute the case and the TPD is tied into state and federal databases. The fact is there was a state van outside Amores and whether or not the FBI jumped in for whatever reason is irrelavent to the actual facts of FBI and State getting involved in helping TPD.
« tracy78 wrote on Sunday, Nov 01 at 08:27 AM »
Welfare Bound,

You need to get your facts straight. Yes, the FBI helped with the Huckaby case, but they always help with missing children cases.

As far as Amores is concerned, Tracy PD handled that case all by themselves. They did not ask for or receive assistance from the FBI or the state.
« adios wrote on Sunday, Nov 01 at 06:58 AM »
Time to get rid of the freeloaders at the top!


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.