Coalition sets up house for homeless
by Joel Danoy / Tracy Press
Jun 22, 2012 | 2135 views | 16 16 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Volunteer Cesar Reyes (left) and Pastor Tom Bardwell carry a couch into the house on Thursday, June 21, into the residence at t 26 W. Emerson Ave.  Glenn Moore/Tracy Press
view slideshow (5 images)
A homeless organization is converting a single-family home in central Tracy to support as many as to 10 homeless people as they transition from the streets to a place of their own.

Coalition of Tracy Citizens to Assist the Homeless has leased the residence at 26 W. Emerson Ave. and is getting it ready to accept as many as six men and four women on its opening day, July 1, according to coalition director Marvin Rothschild.

The residence is a temporary place for occupants to stay while they find employment or save enough money to get over their financial woes, Rothschild said.

“This is a great day for Tracy and those who live on the streets,” he said. “It’s a positive step in the right direction for us as a group and for the people that need us.”

Rothschild, who announced his resignation as director effective July 3, has recruited Rev. Tom Bardwell as head administrator of the infant program.

Bardwell, a Tracy resident who is pastor at True Light Ministries Full Gospel Baptist Church in Oakland, was overseer of six similar homes in that city before stepping down in 2010 while fighting pancreatic cancer.

“I told Marvin I would come back because I got some of my step back,” he said.

As the first place in Tracy to accept both men and women off the streets, Rothschild and Bardwell acknowledged that strict rules and guidelines for the occupants were necessary to “set the tone in the house,” Bardwell said.

“We know the city and the police and everybody else is watching us,” he said. “Some peoples want us to fail, but if we get this going the right way in the beginning, we got a chance at something.”



‘We made it happen’

For Rothschild, acquiring a space to help homeless people get off the streets was his aim when he formed the coalition three years ago.

“Our primary goal is not to feed, not to get their teeth pulled, but to get as many as possible in a home,” he said. “I will pull back more and more here as the time goes, but right now I want to see this through.”

He said the coalition had several problems with purchasing property because it was too small a nonprofit, while several possible sites were too far from downtown Tracy.

Rothschild declined to comment about contract length or rates the coalition negotiated with the homeowner.

The San Joaquin County Assessor’s Office lists the total property’s value in 2011 at $190,088 — $65,548 for the 0.14-acre lot and $124,540 for the structure.

“Some people might not say it’s the best, but we are doing it — this is going to happen,” Rothschild said.

The residence is a one-story house with a one-bedroom loft building in the backyard.

Bardwell expects to put two sets of bunk beds and two single beds in the main house for the men. The women, he said, would sleep in the back building, where four single beds are being set up. The structure was built nearly 30 years ago without permits and can’t technically be zoned as housing, according to Bardwell.

By not installing a stove or kitchen sink, the coalition will keep the structure technically nonresidential. Occupants will have access to a bathroom, refrigerator and microwave, Bardwell said.

He said the coalition was accepting applications from potential occupants and noted that preliminary interviews were being set up.

An initial interview will include questions about each person’s future and drive to succeed. A background check and final interview could also be included in the selection process, Bardwell said.

If accepted, occupants will have about six months to a year to find places of their own. But that time length is negotiable, he said.

“This is not a flophouse where peoples are going to come and kick back on the couch all day,” Bardwell said. “We want real peoples who are going to change their lives for the better, so we can make exceptions if you doing that.”



Standard of living

Many occupants, Bardwell said, are coming from troubled backgrounds and need “structure in their lives.”

A strict set of rules for the residence is being developed, but Bardwell said a zero-tolerance policy would apply to using or possessing drugs or alcohol or breaking any laws either there or on the streets.

There will be one television in the residence and an enforced curfew, and occupants must be actively working to secure a means out of the house. No pets are allowed. Sexual relationships are strictly prohibited, he said.

“They need more than just food — they need a physical place to come and get it together,” Bardwell said. “When they have a place to lay their head, they get their mind more focused and get steady to try and get a job.”

Occupants will be banned from loitering in the front yard or disturbing neighbors, and smoking will be allowed only in the backyard.

Bardwell said the coalition chose the residence only after “receiving the blessing from neighbors.”

“We wanted to know what people thought about this, and everyone seemed OK with it,” he said. “There were a couple issues, but we will work that out. The bottom line is these peoples won’t be hanging out, getting drunk in the yard or making noise. They will be gone if they do.”

Several neighbors declined to comment Wednesday, June 20, about the home’s new use.

During his time in Oakland, Bardwell said he gained several contacts that he hopes will help him in Tracy. He would like to have career-building specialists work with occupants on résumé writing, interview questions and reading improvement exercises.

“We’re going to run across a lot of people that just need help or direction tapping into a source of income,” he said. “You just need to help them until they reach that level. A lot of them need education, because they can’t read or write the best. We want to give them that here.”

Bardwell added that in the future he hopes to secure several computers to teach occupants computer literacy skills so they could apply to jobs online.

“You have to empower them — that’s the key,” he said. “Show them how to do it, and then when they can do it, you see that change in them.”

A volunteer house manager will live in the home, while Bardwell will be present during daytime hours. The house manager will enforce the rules and also act as cook for the house, serving three meals a day.

Occupants will be required to make a small monetary donation to cover the cost of utilities and food.

Bardwell said the coalition would establish a “rainy day fund” to cover expenses in the event the home isn’t fully occupied.



More to come?

Rothschild said the coalition would like to find more structures to temporarily house homeless people, but he noted that the success of this home will determine future actions.

“We have big plans, but it all counts on this,” he said.

Bardwell said he hoped to use the residence as a place for short-term residents and overnight guests. He hopes a new dialog between the coalition and the Tracy police can begin.

“My biggest thing that I really want to make sure we always have is, if the Tracy police are taking the peoples to jail that are homeless, instead of them taking these peoples to the county jail, the police can bring them to us, and we can take them overnight and see what we can do to help them,” he said. “It’s about looking out for them kind of folks, and plus it helps out the county jail.”



Bare necessities

The Coalition of Tracy Citizens to Assist the Homeless needs several major items for its new house for the homeless:

• Two sets of bunk beds and seven single beds

• Washer and dryer

• Two refrigerators

• Dressers

The house could also use many smaller items:

• Lamps

• Tables

• Dining room sets

For information about becoming an occupant or donating items, call Marvin Rothschild: 914-5242.
Comments
(16)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Anyhoo085
|
July 07, 2012
To the neighbors who are upset about this shelter....have you ever been homeless? Do you know what it is like? Can you say with Assurity that homeless people, let's call them people without a home, are bad people? I read the comments telling supporters of the shelter to think of how they would feel to have a shelter in their neighborhood. Would they feel safe? There are so many good people needing shelter and help finding work. Homeless does not equal bad people or druggy. And even if they used to use drugs and that is how they landed themselves in their current situation, don't they also deserve a safe home to live in. A supportive environment to thrive and better themselves and to remain free from addiction. Which would thereby better the community of Tracy as a whole. And as a final note... If you truly feel these people needing shelter are such a threat, and they are coming regardless, is it really a good idea to make them feel so unwelcome and unsupported and possibly have them return the hostility. You catch more flies with honey than with

vinegar. If you want them to be good neighbors to you, be a good neighbor to them.
debbdaves
|
June 25, 2012
I thought Tracyites took pride in being Christian. What happened to love thy neighbor? Is it only for rich neighbor who is not homeless? What would Jesus say? Shame on you.
aztec
|
June 25, 2012
debbdaves,

So would it be OK to send them to your neighborhood? I don't recall Hidden Lake having a Homeless Shelter?
aztec
|
June 25, 2012
This is very scary and disappointing!! We were never informed and never gave our blessing to Rev. Bardwell. We were misrepresented and we demand answers. Why would you put a Homeless Shelter in a Residential area were kids, senior citizens and a school 1 block away? It's NOT regulated by the State or County...background checks, finger print, test for STD's, immunizations etc. Not to mention, we've had 3 Home Burglaries within 2 months!!!
Glory83
|
June 25, 2012
This “Reverend” is a liar; this neighborhood never gave their blessings for this home to be opened here. I have spoken too many of the neighbors and nobody ever gave their blessings. Most were totally unaware that this was even happening! After seeing this article I spoke with both of the men that are mentioned as part of the “coalition”. I found out that drug test will NOT be given regularly, only after they are suspected of use. Which means they will not be tested until it is too late! Also I was told that even though they do background checks only sex offenders and violent crimes are not permitted. This means people with previous drug history, or burglaries ARE allowed. There are young children in this neighborhood as well as the elderly. If the “coalition” really cared about helping people, they would not start by putting others in harms way. How is it even legal to open a place that is going to put residents in danger?
estopka
|
June 25, 2012
I was shocked to find out via the newspaper that a homeless shelter was being set up in my quite,safe neighborhood. In the Tracy press article Rev. Tom Bardwell stated he chose the residency only after " receiving the blessing from neighbors" That statement is FALSE, the neighbors were never informed by Rev. Tom Bardwell or anyone else. The neighborhood is opposed to the shelter for many reasons; the majority of homeless people have or had drug,alchol,mental illness & have past criminal records we do not feel safe having them in our quite neighborhood. I am not opposed to lending a helping hand but do not set up the shelter in a residental neighborhood put it in a commerical area away from the schools and elderly residents. If you do not agree then I suggest that you have the homeless shelter in your neighborhood then lets see how well your neighbors react.
Glory83
|
June 25, 2012
I am glad to see some neighbors are speaking out. There is going to be a meeting at this shelter (26 West Emerson) on Wednesday at 7pm. I urge you to tell your neighbors and go so that it is made clear that we are unhappy with their lies and that they DO NOT have our blessings. Hope you can make it.
LAM75
|
June 24, 2012
I want to say this sounds wonderful and I wish the most success. I totally agree with the standards of living and hopefully someone will monitor the area 24 hrs to make sure they are following the rules. I care about the neighbors too.

Times are really tough now, and people who have it tough are so fortunate people like Marvin Rothschild are around.
Sneaky
|
June 22, 2012
I hope this works out well for them. If I were a neighbor I have to admit I would be a bit concerned about it. Depending on how the home is managed it could be a great thing or be really awful for the area. Only time will tell.

This one rule:

"Sexual relationships are strictly prohibited..." struck me as more than a bit prudish and even perhaps counter productive. It makes me wonder if the home is not run by raving fundamentalists. If one of their residents happens to fall in love and start a sexual relationship I dont see the hazard. If anything it would tend to make them behave more responsibly since they would have someone else to think about.
Glory83
|
June 25, 2012
You are correct, this can be awful for this area. That is why the people are against it and not for it as the article claimed. We are very disappointed to have been misrepresented in this article.
princesaportuguese
|
June 22, 2012
I'm not sure how large the backyard is, but maybe they can start a garden so they can have a continuous flow of food. A good book to get Garden plans and tips is The Backyard Homestead. Just make sure you get non-genetically modified seeds/plants like Heirloom.

Sneaky
|
June 22, 2012
I suspect most homeless would be happy to eat almost any fresh fruit or veggies. Concerns about genetically modified foods (which pose no actual risk) are worries of rich folks with too little else to worry about.
princesaportuguese
|
June 23, 2012
@ Sneaky:I'm in no way rich and have done years worth of research on GMO's that show quite the contrary and DO pose severe risk to the human digestive system and reproductive systems. As far as what homeless people would be happy to eat, it would seem you're implying that just because they are homeless they don't deserve to eat good, organic foods.
Sneaky
|
June 24, 2012
I am not suggesting the homeless eat anything I wouldnt or that organic foods are too good for them. I am suggesting, however, that "organic" foods are an advertising gimmick and are no better than their regular or even GM counter parts.

BTW, on the safety of GM:

2008 review published by the Royal Society of Medicine noted that GM foods have been eaten by millions of people worldwide for over 15 years, with no reports of ill effects.(Key S, Ma JK, Drake PM (2008)." Genetically modified plants and human health". J R Soc Med 101 (6): 290–8.). Similarly a 2004 report from the US National Academies of Sciences stated: "To date, no adverse health effects attributed to genetic engineering have been documented in the human population."(NRC. (2004). Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects. National Academies Press.). The European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation 2010 report on GMOs noted that "The main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research, and involving more than 500 independent research groups, is that biotechnology, and in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than e.g. conventional plant breeding technologies." (European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation; Directorate E — Biotechnologies, Agriculture, Food; Unit E2 — Biotechnologies (2010). A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001 - 2010).
cargirl2U
|
June 22, 2012
Come on Tracy press!!! REALLY...I find it to be in extreme poor taste, how you "quoted" this gentleman.

At least someone is trying to do something!
Sneaky
|
June 22, 2012
I am not sure I see the issue with how anyone was quoted in the article. A quote is a verbatim replication of what a person said. If he said what is reflected in the article then there should be no issue with it. Some of his language may not be flawless but that is hardly the focus here. Nobody expects the homeless to speak perfect English.


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.