Charting a business-friendly course
by Jon Mendelson / Tracy Press
Jul 30, 2010 | 3775 views | 99 99 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
City leaders tout a streamlined permitting system as a key part of a "business friendly" strategy at Tracy s City Hall.  Press photo illustration
view slideshow (2 images)
Tracy hasn’t always had the best reputation as a place to run or start a business. In fact, some officials and business people admit it was downright dismal.

For Mayor Brent Ives, learning about the city’s less-than-stellar reputation came as a surprise.

“I didn’t find out until I was mayor what kind of reputation Tracy had with the business community,” Ives said.

But Ives insists that the perception, whether rightly or wrongly earned, is changing.

“We’re the only city in this county that’s doing anything proactive in terms of economic development,” he said. “I think businesses are going to have a hard time finding places to build (that are as welcoming as Tracy).”

Ives and other officials at City Hall tout several efforts they say have made Tracy more “business friendly” — a term Ives says is really shorthand for bringing more jobs to town.

“The best thing I can do is to give (a Tracy resident) a job in Tracy,” Ives said, who added that homegrown jobs are the key to putting the city and its residents on more stable financial footing during a time when the unemployment rate in San Joaquin County hovers at 16½ percent, according to California’s Employment Development Department.

But Ives and other Tracy officials don’t most vigorously tout big-ticket economic efforts, like enticing a Macy’s to move into the stagnant West Valley Mall with $2.75 million of city capital improvement money or using $10 million in redevelopment funds to revise the downtown streetscape.

Instead, people like Andrew Malik, the city’s development director, say strategies such as refining the city’s business permit process are what will truly make a difference for Tracy’s economy.

About 1½ years ago, Malik said, the city began to simplify its permitting systems and make them more transparent, including an online tracking system that lets applicants find out in real time the status of each request.

He also said that the city has become more flexible about fast-tracking the review for business development, citing as an example the ongoing construction of WinCo Foods near the West Valley Mall. City inspectors and engineers have worked to reduce WinCo’s break-ground-to-opening timeline from eight months to six.

The upshot of those efforts, Malik said, is that the city now has one of the friendliest and fastest permit processes in San Joaquin County. And business folks, he insisted, are starting to notice.

“In fact, when we did the Home Depot and Crate and Barrel distribution centers, the contractor basically said, ‘Years ago, I’d done work in Tracy, and it was difficult to get through the process,’” Malik shared. “He said ‘This is a new day, and I will tout Tracy, and I would love to come back and do projects in this town.’”

City Manager Leon Churchill, whom Ives credited with guiding the city on a more business-friendly bent, agreed with Malik. Churchill boasted that Tracy recently got a pair of business referrals — which he said he couldn’t yet disclose — because other nearby cities couldn’t process their permits fast enough.

But he said rebuilding the city’s reputation as the place to do business in the Central Valley takes more than just a leaner bureaucracy.

“It’s also about having the ability to make relationships with people in the business community,” he said.

Dan Schack has been a member of Tracy’s business world for decades and is now the interim president of the Tracy City Center Association, a group of downtown business and property owners that formed this year to boost the fortunes of Tracy’s historical heart.

He agreed that the city’s efforts regarding business development are more than just lip service.

“The city of Tracy has been trying to recover from a perception out there in the business world as being very onerous and non business-friendly,” Schack said.

“Since our new city manager, Leon Churchill, has come on board, he understands — and I’m very confident that he is committed to changing that perception and has been working very, very hard to change that.”

Schack cautioned, however, that significant progress could be difficult to detect at first.

“Just like everything, not everything works according to plan, and I think everyone realizes it’s a time thing,” he said, though he remains bullish on the city’s future, especially if, he said, the entire town adopts the same proactive outlook.

Brian Nokes, whose Tracy Dodge-Chrysler-Jeep and Hyundai outfit recently purchased Stan Morri Ford and converted it to Tracy Ford, agrees with Schack’s optimism.

“A lot of retailers, including ourselves, think Tracy’s on the verge of turning around,” Nokes said after moving into his position as Tracy Ford’s president.

He also praised the city for its help with his company’s purchase.

“They’ve been great,” he said. “I think the city’s definitely been more business-friendly.”

Signs of contention

Not everyone shares the same rosy view of the city’s relationship with entrepreneurs, though.

In the past two weeks, about 30 letters were mailed to various downtown Tracy businesses telling them that at least one of their advertising signs is in violation of city code.

Several outfits downtown sport non-conforming signs that have garnered complaints, according to Ana Contreras, head of Tracy’s code enforcement department.

“We repeatedly get complaints from the community about illegal signs,” she said, including those of the A-frame and banner varieties, in use by several businesses.

Kimberly Matlock of the city’s planning department said banner signs and other “non-permanent” displays are allowed only on a temporary basis, because they don’t hold up over time.

One of those downtown businesses is Shorter’s Rib Pit and Catering on Ninth Street, which has a professionally printed banner high on the building’s façade.

Dave Shorter, who owns the barbecue joint along with Donelle Shorter, says he feels as if the city is working against his efforts to run a successful business. From his perspective, he said, the city’s business-friendly focus has been “just talk.”

“What they don’t understand is that you need all the customers you can get,” he said.

He added that, while he is in the process of figuring out a permanent sign, placing burdens on entrepreneurs hurts the vitality of the city itself, not just the targeted businesses.

According to Matlock, the process to get a permanent sign is one of the fastest and simplest in the city.

“We understand that not everyone knows all the codes, and we’re here to assist… and help you through the process,” she said, emphasizing that city planners want to work with business owners instead of against them. “We’re really interested in making the process as smooth as possible.”

Permits for business signs carry a flat rate of $456, unless a property owner has a special pre-agreement with the city, which can reduce that charge. Matlock also said a business owner would need to take out a building permit before any permanent sign could be installed.

According to Shorter, that’s a hurdle for him and others trying to stay afloat in a tough economy.

“To hinder me in that way is just not fair,” he said.

Comments
(99)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
HawkEyes2see
|
August 03, 2010
TomBenigno,

Those 700 new jobs will be welcomed like a true friend, right now.
AverageBri
|
August 03, 2010
And the 300 jobs to construct the solar farm will also be temporary, short-term jobs.

http://www.tracypress.com/view/full_story/6818571/article-State-of-the-City-preview

AverageBri
|
August 03, 2010
17 new jobs, not 400. The 400 are short-term temporary jobs for construction of the power plant expansion. Only 17 will be permanent.

http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/4362102

HawkEyes2see
|
August 03, 2010
Tracy Press,

One thing the article didn't point out is the 400 new jobs over by the new solar farm.
dcose
|
August 03, 2010
TomFunito wrote on Tuesday, Aug 03 at 06:00 PM »

"Duhcose: If the cows are feed, what does that make you the pig? Recall the add "FEED THE PIG"

Unable to decipher Major Tom. Add?

"Lets ignore chickenhawk,what a child?"

Why?
TomBenigno
|
August 03, 2010
Duhcose: If the cows are feed, what does that make you the pig? Recall the add "FEED THE PIG".I also like having fun DuhCose.

Lets ignore chickenhawk,what a child? See you around.
dcose
|
August 03, 2010
Apologies to all for running Tom around the block

TomBenigno wrote on Tuesday, Aug 03 at 03:43 PM »

"Just the fact that I keep up with your attempt at terrorize, myself and others tells others that you are losing the battle."

Achieving Irrationality Word by Word

"If you mean that people keep buying your product and are satisified, so are cows when they are feed."

Sorry to terrorize you but, If cows are feed, doesn't that mean they're steak?
HawkEyes2see
|
August 03, 2010
Interested Readers,

Let's ignore Tom. And get back to the topic.
TomBenigno
|
August 03, 2010
DuhCose:

Just the fact that I keep up with your attempt at terrorize, myself and others tells others that you are losing the battle.

If you mean that people keep buying your product and are satisified, so are cows when they are feed.

Thank you for the publicity.
dcose
|
August 03, 2010
TeaBagging Tom

Cool...

Your Class Warfare Sliming

Your Unsupported Accusation Sliming

& Your "Though i campainged, supported and voted for a hardcore liberal Democrat, I'm a great Republican" tripe.

35 years of screwing people. I can only offer the following: Either they enjoyed it (doubtful) or it doesn't happen (more likely).

Have you ever supported any of the claims you make. Thought not.
HawkEyes2see
|
August 03, 2010
You mean the part where you are helping the people? Ya. I guess we missed it.

Was that explained on your website too?

TomBenigno
|
August 03, 2010
Chicken Hawk : Your reading the wrong lines to the story.
TomBenigno
|
August 03, 2010
DCose:

Some how you seem to think that you are a good republican, if you flecce the tax payers Republican or democrat.

Your logic is you build them and then you will screw them, by selling overpriced properties. You make it and the banks make on the backs of the poor hard working class.

My republican backgroud tells me to help the people not screw them.

Happy hunting.
HawkEyes2see
|
August 03, 2010
TomBenigno,

Go to the next Music in The Park. There was a survey there. It was also available in the city website. What you see from the data displayed, at Music in The Park is..

People want parks.

You and dfras13 are wrong. It's not illegal or unethical for families to want parks.

If this is about the Holly Sports Park then you're wrong about that too. Maybe you didn't, but other people wanted this.

Get your facts straight.
dcose
|
August 03, 2010
TomGasbag wrote on Tuesday, Aug 03 at 07:21 AM »

"Solution: The city makes money off the permits, the developer and the home buyers after the project is completed. The developer gets rich and the...

home buyer is strapped for 30 years or more."

Be it known to all:

At the point of a firearm... I forced each and every homebuyer to take out a mortgage (including those who wanted to pay cash).

Furthermore... I told them what interest rate they would pay and forced to the women folk into indentured servitude...

Again, your irrationality precluded me from voting for you.

MSUAYG- (Making Stuff Up As You Go)
TomBenigno
|
August 03, 2010
Greenhornet:

Do the simple math on the big question. If a farmer sell his land to a developer and the developer, subs out the sewer and other infrastructure to an outside company he becomes the general contractor.

The plot plan has already been designed,for so many houses per acre. The plan had already went to the planing commission and the parks were part of that plan.



Lets say the permits were $60,000 per permit, the developer must know if he can profit by the cut in density to allow for the parks. Afterall the land has already been paid for, so the city wants it's parks and the developer must build more houses per acre.

The problem is the home buyer pays for the whole down grade on lot size and the increase in home price or up grade for the parks.

Solution: The city makes money off the permits, the developer and the home buyers after the project is completed. The developer gets rich and the home buyer is strapped for 30 years or more. Do you still want more parks?

Do the math on the project how much can you afford to spend.

1. land price $100,000 per acre

2. Infrastructure ?

3. permits $60,000

4. cost of building ?

5. selling price average $550,000

6. What the city gets?

6. Your mortgage
thegreenlantern
|
August 02, 2010
"13.12.070 - Payment of reimbursements by the City for park projects.

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 13.08.070(a), as of the date of a properly submitted request for reimbursement for a park fee project, the City shall designate a separate reimbursement account within the relevant fee fund for the individual park fee project. The City Engineer shall designate a specified geographical area which receives a benefit from the individual park fee project. To the extent that the City collects fees from development projects within the specified geographical area, the City shall deposit in the reimbursement account ninety-five (95%) percent of all fees collected. The City shall not designate a separate ten (10%) percent reimbursement account for park fees, as otherwise described in section 13.08.070(a). All other non-contradictory provisions of section 13.08.070 shall apply to park fees. "

Again, Hope this helps!

thegreenlantern
|
August 02, 2010
dfras13:

Just to be clear. They didn't break the law by providing 7 refunds for the 7 shared parks that you talked about.

By the way, prior to impact fees your taxes (mello roos) paid for this. You should thank the city for not charging YOU the tax.

Again. Hope that helps!
thegreenlantern
|
August 02, 2010
dfras13 wrote:

Once again I think you're missing the point. It's not who brings the impact that is the issue, it's the ethical dilemma that's created by the city failing to follow their own policies on impact fees. Just because the public opinion believes it's fair doesn't make it fair, or ethical, or legal.

Much like any other law that is in place but not followed. Either follow the rule or repeal it but you can't have the rule and continue to break it because no one is looking and think that's OK.

dfras13:

Builders don't share water pipes. So they would not get a refund for water pipes.

Those are instances where builders shared parks in Tracy. There are seven shared parks.

Hope that helps!

dcose
|
August 02, 2010
Double negative Tom


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.